Radio Webs - Support Architecture for Mobile Web Access

R. Ludwig,N. Niebert,R. Quinet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0000358

1997-09-10

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Run Tian,Xudong Duan,Ning Kong,Xinhua Li,Jian Wang,Hua Tian,Zhanjun Shi,Shigui Yan,Jingyi Lyu,Kunzheng Wang,Pei Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000002

2023-01-01

Abstract:This new robotic-assisted TKA system is safe and effective. The authors found that preoperative HKA angle deviation affects the postoperative HKA angle deviation. The robotic-assisted system has similar results to those reported by the traditional method with regard to restoring the mechanical axis of the leg and improving prosthesis alignment and clinical outcomes in patients with slight lower extremity alignment deviations preoperatively. For patients with severe preoperative lower extremity alignment deviations, the effectiveness in terms of the improvement in mechanical axis of the leg and prosthesis alignment were better with the robotic-assisted system, whereas the effectiveness of clinical outcomes was similar. A larger sample size and longer follow-up period are needed to determine whether the improved mechanical axis of the leg and prosthesis alignment observed with the robotic-assisted system can achieve better long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Knee replacement surgery is more precise with

Shreepal Munot,Hrushikesh Saraf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2021.048

2023-04-25

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery

Abstract:Robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty is one the recent advance to improve its outcome especially to address the issue of precision. Longetivity of TKA primarily depends on proper implant alignment. The Aim of this study is to compare the precision of robotic assisted TKA with the ideally planned mechanical parameters in TKA. A total of 50 robotic assisted TKA patients were included retrospectively in the study. Patient's post operative mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (mPTA) in AP radiogram.and anterior femoral offset ratio, posterior condylar offset ratio, femoral component flexion, posterior tibial slope in lateral radiograms were evaluated with ideal values for specific parameter. Number of outliers were counted separately with values beyond 3 of malalignment. The mean postoperative FTA, LDFA, mPTA recorded is 0.15 ±0.70, 89.78±0.79, 89.80±0.86 respectively. The mean postoperative posterior tibial slope, femoral flexion is 3.03±0.35, 3.14±0.60 respectively. All the parameters when compared with planned ideal values (i.e. mFTA= 0, mPTA=90, LDFA=90, Posterior tibial slope=3, femoral component flexion=3) did not show significant difference. Study shows promising results with near normal execution of planned TKA. Robotic assisted TKA can be a game changer and a handy tool to improve the alignment of mechanical axis in TKAs.
[Should patients with idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis receive treatment or not?].

N. Sotelo-Cruz

Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México

Abstract:
Functional alignment maximises advantages of robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty with better patient‐reported outcomes compared to mechanical alignment

Jong Hwa Lee,Seung Cheol Kwon,Ji Hyo Hwang,Joon Kyu Lee,Joong Il Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12120

2024-03-09

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose Robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) enables adjustment of implant position to achieve the surgeon's preferred alignment. However, the alignment concept that most effectively enhances patient satisfaction remains unclear. This study compares the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent functionally aligned RTKA (FA‐RTKA), mechanically aligned conventional TKA (MA‐CTKA) and mechanically aligned RTKA (MA‐RTKA). Methods A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent primary TKA for knee osteoarthritis. One hundred and forty‐seven knees were performed with MA‐CTKA, followed by 72 consecutive knees performed with MA‐RTKA, and subsequently, 70 consecutive knees performed with FA‐RTKA were enrolled. After 1:1 propensity score matching of patient demographics, 70 knees were finally included in each group. The extent of additional soft tissue release during surgery was identified, and the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification was utilised to categorise the alignment. At the 1‐year follow‐up, patient‐reported outcomes, including the pain Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and Forgotten Joint Score‐12, were also compared among the groups. Results The FA‐RTKA group showed significantly less additional soft tissue release than the MA‐CTKA and MA‐RTKA groups (15.7%, 38.6% and 35.7%, respectively; p = 0.006). Statistically significant differences in functional scores were observed in the postoperative 1‐year clinical outcomes in favour of the FA‐RTKA group, which had a significantly larger percentage of knees that maintained constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity than those of the other groups. Conclusions Functionally aligned TKA showed superior 1‐year postoperative patient‐reported outcomes compared with those of conventional and robotic arm‐assisted mechanically aligned TKA. Therefore, the advantage of RTKA is maximised when the implant positioning is based on functional alignment. The application of RTKA with mechanical alignment has been proven ineffective in improving the clinical outcomes of patients. Level of Evidence Level III.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Restored the Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio and the Insall-Salvati Index Compared to the Manual Technique; A Cohort-Matched Study.

A. Malkani,Antonia F. Chen,F. Orozco,F. Kolisek,Langan S. Smith,Linsen T Samuel,O. Mahoney,A. Sultan,Michael A Mont,A. Khlopas,M. Bhowmik‐Stoker,R. Molloy,N. Sodhi

2019-05-15

Abstract:INTRODUCTION Despite the demonstrated success of modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it remains a procedure that involves sophisticated preoperative planning and meticulous technique to reconstruct the mechanical axis, achieve ideal joint balance, and restore maximal range-of-motion (ROM). Recently, robotic-arm assisted TKAs have emerged as a promising new technology offering several technical advantages, and it is achieving excellent radiological results, including establishing the posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI). Studies have demonstrated that these parameters are surgically modifiable, and their accurate restoration (fewer mean differences) correlate with improved final joint range-of-motion. However, there is a paucity of studies that evaluate these parameters in light of performing robotic-arm assisted TKA. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare: 1) PCOR and 2) ISI restoration in a cohort of patients who underwent robotic-arm assisted versus manual TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated a series of 43 consecutive robotic-arm assisted (mean age 67 years; range, 46 to 79 years) and 39 manual total knee arthroplasties (mean age 66 years; range, 48 to 78 years) performed by seven fellowship-trained joint reconstructive surgeons. All surgeries were performed using medial para-patellar approaches by high-volume surgeons. Using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System, preoperative and four-to six-week postoperative radiographs were analyzed to determine the PCOR and patella height based on the ISI. RESULTS The mean postoperative PCOR was larger in manual TKA when compared to the robotic-assisted cohort (0.53 vs. 0.49; p=0.024). The absolute mean difference between pre- and postoperative PCOR was larger in manual when compared to robotic-arm assisted TKA (0.03 vs. 0.004; p=0.01). In addition, the number of patients who had postoperative ISI outside of the normal range (0.8 to 0.12) was higher in the manual cohort (12 vs. 4). CONCLUSION Patients who underwent TKA using robotic-arm assisted technology had smaller mean differences in PCOR which has been previously shown to correlate with better joint ROM at one year following surgery. In addition, these patients were less likely to have values outside of normal ISI, which means they are less likely to develop patella baja, a condition in which the patella would impinge onto the patellar component, leading to restricted flexion and overall decreased ROM.

Engineering,Medicine
Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Philip Winnock de Grave,Thomas Luyckx,Kurt Claeys,Thomas Tampere,Jonas Kellens,Jacobus Müller,Paul Gunst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06165-4

2020-07-31

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA ( n = 40) and with aMA ( n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores ( p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better ( p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly ( p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS ( β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction ( β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA. Level of evidence Level III, comparative study.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Junren Zhang,Wofhatwa Solomon Ndou,Nathan Ng,Paul Gaston,Philip M. Simpson,Gavin J. Macpherson,James T. Patton,Nicholas D. Clement

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4

2021-02-06

Abstract:Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the accuracy of component positioning, alignment and balancing techniques employed, patient-reported outcomes, and complications of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) with manual TKA (mTKA) and the associated learning curve. Searches of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar were performed in October 2020 using PRISMA guidelines. Search terms included “robotic”, “knee” and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for RATKA and those comparing the component position accuracy, alignment and balancing techniques, functional outcomes, or complications with mTKA. There were 198 articles identified, following full text screening, 16 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and reported the learning curve of rTKA ( n =5), component positioning accuracy ( n =6), alignment and balancing techniques ( n =7), functional outcomes ( n =7), or complications ( n =5). Two studies reported the learning curve using CUSUM analysis to establish an inflexion point for proficiency which ranged from 7 to 11 cases and there was no learning curve for component positioning accuracy. The meta-analysis showed a significantly lower difference between planned component position and implanted component position, and the spread was narrower for RATKA compared with the mTKA group (Femur coronal: mean 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.55, p <0.00001; Tibia coronal: mean 1.56, 95% CI 1.32–1.81, p <0.00001). Three studies reported using different alignment and balancing techniques between mTKA and RATKA, two studies used the same for both group and two studies did not state the methods used in their RATKA groups. RATKA resulted in better Knee Society Score compared to mTKA in the short-to-mid-term follow up (95%CI [− 1.23, − 0.51], p =0.004). There was no difference in arthrofibrosis, superficial and deep infection, wound dehiscence, or overall complication rates. RATKA demonstrated improved accuracy of component positioning and patient-reported outcomes. The learning curve of RATKA for operating time was between 7 and 11 cases. Future well-powered studies on RATKAs should report on the knee alignment and balancing techniques utilised to enable better comparisons on which techniques maximise patient outcomes. Level of evidence III.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Narendra V. Vaidya,Ajinkya N. Deshpande,Taufiq Panjwani,Rakesh Patil,Tanmay Jaysingani,Pratik Patil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06353-2

2020-11-09

Abstract:Correct positioning and alignment of the prosthesis is a very important factor for durability of prosthesis and implant survival which is improved with the use of technology in total knee arthroplasty. However, the long-term functional outcomes and survivorship are unclear. For this study, it was hypothesized that mechanical axis alignment of lower limb, post-operative joint line restoration, femoral and tibial component alignment is more accurate with the new handheld semi-active robotic-assisted TKA.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty have a greater improvement in knee-specific pain but not in function

Nick D. Clement,Steven Galloway,Jenny Baron,Karen Smith,David J. Weir,David J. Deehan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-1196.r1

2024-05-01

The Bone & Joint Journal

Abstract:Aims The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA). Methods A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points. Results There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the knee-specific measures (WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) or HRQoL measures (EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) at 12 months between the groups. However, the rTKA group had significantly (p = 0.029) greater improvements in the WOMAC pain component (mean difference 9.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 18.4) over the postoperative period (two, six, and 12 months), which was clinically meaningful. This was not observed for function (p = 0.248) or total (p = 0.147) WOMAC scores. The rTKA group was significantly (p = 0.039) more likely to have expectation of ‘Relief of daytime pain in the joint’ when compared with the mTKA group. There were no other significant differences in expectations met between the groups. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction with their knee (p = 0.464), return to work (p = 0.464), activities (p = 0.293), or pain (p = 0.701). Conclusion Patients undergoing rTKA had a clinically meaningful greater improvement in their knee pain over the first 12 months, and were more likely to have fulfilment of their expectation of daytime pain relief compared with patients undergoing mTKA. However, rTKA was not associated with a clinically significant greater knee-specific function or HRQoL, according to current definitions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):450–459.

surgery,orthopedics
One-Year Patient Outcomes for Robotic-Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robert C Marchand,Nipun Sodhi,Hiba K Anis,Joseph Ehiorobo,Jared M Newman,Kelly Taylor,Caitlin Condrey,Matthew S Hepinstall,Michael A Mont,Robert C. Marchand,Hiba K. Anis,Jared M. Newman,Matthew S. Hepinstall,Michael A. Mont

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977

2019-04-08

The Journal of Knee Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Although there are many studies on the alignment advantages when using the robotic arm–assisted (RAA) system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there have been questions regarding patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use this index to compare: (1) total, (2) physical function, and (3) pain scores for manual versus RAA patients. We compared 53 consecutive RAA to 53 consecutive manual TKAs. No differences in preoperative scores were found between the cohorts. Patients were administered a modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index satisfaction survey preoperatively and at 1-year postoperatively. The results were broken down to: (1) total, (2) physical function, and (3) pain scores. Univariate analysis with independent samples t-tests was used to compare 1-year postoperative scores. Multivariate models with stepwise backward linear regression were utilized to evaluate the associations between scores and surgical technique, age, sex, as well as body mass index (BMI). Statistical analyses were performed with a p < 0.05 to determine significance. The RAA cohort had significantly improved mean total (6 ± 6 vs. 9 ± 8 points, p = 0.03) and physical function scores (4 ± 4 vs. 6 ± 5 points, p = 0.02) when compared with the manual cohort. The mean pain score for the RAA cohort (2 ± 3 points [range, 0–14 points]) was also lower than that for the manual cohort (3 ± 4 points [range, 0–11 points]) (p = 0.06). On backward linear regression analyses, RAA was found to be significantly associated with more improved total (β coefficient [β] −0.208, standard error [SE] 1.401, p < 0.05), function (β = 0.216, SE = 0.829, p < 0.05), and pain scores (β −0.181, SE = 0.623, p = 0.063). The RAA technique was found to have the strongest association with improved scores when compared with age, gender, and BMI. This study suggests that RAA patients may have short-term improvements at minimum 1-year postoperatively. However, longer term follow-up with greater sample sizes is needed to further validate these results.
Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Max Ettinger,Lare‐Rene Tuecking,Peter Savov,Henning Windhagen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12143

2024-03-21

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and medial pivot (MP) knee designs already showed superior outcomes in independent comparative studies. The objective of this study was to assess whether rKA with MP TKA provides better clinical and functional outcomes compared to mechanical alignment (MA) with MP TKA. Methods This is a randomised, parallel two group study involving a total of 98 patients with end‐stage knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomly allocated to either rKA or MA TKA procedures conducted with a MP prothesis using patient‐specific instruments between 2017 and 2020. Final follow‐up was at 2 years postoperatively. Demographic data and clinical and functional scores (Oxford knee score, knee society score [KSS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], forgotten joint score [FJS]) were collected and compared preoperative, 1 year postoperative and 2 years postoperative. Coronal plane alignment of the knee and functional knee phenotype classification were recorded. Results A total of 47 patients (rKA) and 51 patients (MA) were included in final analysis. Superior joint awareness scores (FJS) were found at 1 year postoperative for rKA (62.2 vs. 52.4, p = 0.04). KSS subscores (expectation score, satisfaction score) improved with rKA with significant differences at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Major differences between rKA and MA were found in subgroup analysis of varus and neutral CPAK phenotypes. Both 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, FJS was significantly better in KA compared with MA in varus CPAK phenotypes (63.1 vs. 44.9, p = 0.03; 71.1 vs. 46.0, p = 0.005). Further clinical and functional scores showed improvement in the varus CPAK phenotypes with predominantly significant improvement in the expectation and satisfaction KSS subscores. No significant differences were found in the comparison of rKA and MA in neutral CPAK phenotypes. Conclusion The rKA of MP TKA design shows superior patient satisfaction and self‐reported function when compared to MA MP TKA. Furthermore, rKA MP TKA shows superior joint awareness at early postoperative stage. The most important clinical relevance of this study is the clear superiority of rKA in varus phenotypes. Level of Evidence Level II.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Robotic assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Ahmed Daoub,Kaif Qayum,Ravi Patel,Amr Selim,Robin Banerjee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02048-9

2024-10-09

Abstract:The aim of this study is To compare robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on both short- and long-term outcomes A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. The studies included were randomised controlled trials directly comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA. The outcomes were pooled as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval. RevMan software version 5.4 was used for performing the statistical analysis. Nine studies deemed eligible for inclusion. The data showed a significant favouring of robotic-assisted than the conventional TKA in mechanical alignment, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and femoral coronal plane outliers (MD = - 1.10, 95% CI [- 1.51, - 0.69], p < 0.00001), (MD = - 1.19, 95% CI [- 2.35, - 0.03], p = 0.04), and (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.30, 0.80], p = 0.004), respectively. On the other hand, conventional TKA was better in range of motion-flexion (long-term) than the robotic-assisted one (MD = - 3.02, 95% CI [- 3.68, - 2.37], p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between them in knee society score-knee score, knee society score-function score, change in hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee rating scale, and change in range of motion-extension (MD = - 0.36, 95% CI [- 2.43, 1.70], p = 0.73), (MD = - 0.34, 95% CI [- 2.36, 1.68], p = 0.74), (MD = 0.78, 95% CI [- 0.84, 2.40], p = 0.34), and (MD = 0.16, 95% [- 1.32, 1.64], p = 0.83), respectively. Robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated better outcomes than conventional TKA in terms of mechanical alignment and WOMAC scores. However, the conventional TKA showed a better range of motion-flexion in the long term. More data are needed to assess long-term outcomes comprehensively.
Robotic-arm assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty: Functional gait analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Bola Ajekigbe,Jayasree Ramaskandhan,Mr Nick Clement,Steven Galloway,Natasha Gabrov,Karen Smith,Mr David Weir,David Deehan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112112

IF: 2.4

2024-04-20

Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract:The primary aim of this study was to assess whether measures of functional gait assessment were improved with robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) when compared to manual TKA (mTKA). Gait analysis was performed as part of a randomised controlled trial. Walking and relaxed standing assessments were performed using an instrumented mat system. Spatiotemporal variables included gait cycle parameters, anteroposterior and lateral sway, and plantar pressure ratios. Measurements were recorded at pre-operative baseline and 12 months post-operatively. 100 patients were randomised, 50 to each group. Complete gait cycle data were available for 26 rTKA and 23 mTKA patients. Cadence and walking velocity showed overall improvements following surgery, with no difference between the two groups. In the operated limb, overall step and stride times decreased, while step and stride lengths increased. Subgroup analysis showed reduced propulsion time with rTKA, and decreased foot flat and mid stance times with mTKA. Lateral sway was decreased in the rTKA group. Plantar pressure ratios showed an overall increase in hindfoot loading on the operated limb, with no difference between the two groups. No other significant differences were identified between rTKA and mTKA at 12 months, and limitations may include statistical error. A small sample of the study cohort was followed up; analysis may represent the results of satisfied patients with well-functioning TKA. Further study could incorporate proprioceptive and 3D gait analysis techniques to analyse knee kinetics and kinematics with robotic surgery. Pressure mapping could further subdivide the plantar surfaces to explore any nuances in differential loading.

engineering, biomedical,biophysics
Improved Component Placement Accuracy with Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Ormonde Mahoney,Tracey Kinsey,Nipun Sodhi,Michael A. Mont,Antonia F. Chen,Fabio Orozco,William Hozack

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715571

2020-08-31

The Journal of Knee Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Component position of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to influence prosthetic survivorships and clinical outcomes. Our objective was to compare the three-dimensional accuracy to plan of robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) with conventional TKA for component position. We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective study comparing 143 RATKA with 86 conventional TKA operated at four U.S. centers between July 2016 and October 2018. Computed tomography (CT) scans obtained approximately 6 weeks postoperatively were analyzed using anatomical landmarks. Absolute deviation from surgical plans were defined as the absolute value of the difference between the CT measurements and surgeons' femoral and tibial component mechanical varus/valgus alignment, tibial component posterior slope, and femoral component internal/external rotation. Differences of absolute deviations were tested using stratified Wilcoxon's tests that controlled for study center. Patient-reported outcome measures collected through 1 postoperative year were modeled using multiple regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, study center, and the preoperative score. RATKA demonstrated greater accuracy for tibial component alignment (median [25th, 75th percentiles] absolute deviation from plan of all centers combined for conventional vs. RA, 1.7 [0.9, 2.9] vs. 0.9 [0.4, 1.9] degrees, p < 0.001), femoral component rotation (1.5 [0.9, 2.5] vs. 1.3 [0.6, 2.5] degrees, p = 0.015), and tibial slope (2.9 [1.5, 5.0] vs. 1.1 [0.6, 2.0] degrees, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, RATKA showed significantly greater Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) physical component scores (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 2.4 [0.2, 4.5] points, p = 0.034) and qualitatively greater Knee Society (KS) composite functional scores (3.5 [−1.3, 8.2] points, p = 0.159), though not statistically significant. Compared with conventional instrumentation, RATKA demonstrated greater three-dimensional accuracy to plan for various component positioning parameters and clinical improvements in physical status and function with no major safety concerns during the first postoperative year. These results may be attributed to the preoperative CT scan planning, real-time intraoperative feedback, and stereotactic-guided cutting that takes into consideration patient-specific bony anatomy. These findings support the use of RATKA for enhanced arthroplasty outcomes.
Better accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional technique in patients with failed high tibial osteotomy

Ji-Hoon Baek,Su Chan Lee,Dong Nyoung Lee,Juneyoung Heo,Taehyeon Kim,Hye Sun Ahn,Chang Hyun Nam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313391

IF: 3.7

2024-11-12

PLoS ONE

Abstract:This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, mechanical axis, component positioning, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and polyethylene liner thickness between robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional TKA in patients with failed high tibial osteotomy (HTO). A total of 30 patients (30 knees) with failed HTO who underwent TKA using a robot-assisted system between June 2020 and December 2023 were included in this study (robotic group). Additionally, 60 patients (60 knees) with failed HTO who underwent conventional TKA were included as controls (conventional group). Propensity score matching was performed using a 2:1 ratio between the matched participants. The mean follow-up period was 2.1 years in the robotic group and 2.2 years in the conventional group. Clinical evaluations were performed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) rating system. Mechanical axis, component coronal and sagittal positioning, and LLD were evaluated using postoperative radiographs. The thickness of the polyethylene liner was also determined. The mean error values and outliers were calculated and compared between the two groups to determine the accuracy of the mechanical axis, postoperative component positioning, and LLD. The postoperative KSSs in the robotic and conventional groups were not statistically different. The robotic group achieved better accuracy than the conventional group in terms of postoperative mean mechanical axis (1.7° vs. 2.4°, p < 0.05), femur coronal inclination (90.0° vs. 91.6°, p < 0.05), tibial coronal inclination (90.3° vs. 91.3°, p < 0.05), tibial sagittal inclination (90.5° vs. 91.4°, p < 0.05), and LLD (2.2 vs. 7.0 mm, p < 0.05). A significant difference in polyethylene liner thickness was observed between the two groups (p < 0.05). Robotic-assisted TKA showed improved mechanical axis, higher accuracy of component positioning and polyethylene liner thickness, and reduced LLD compared with those of conventional TKA in patients with failed HTO. Further studies with a larger sample size and long-term follow-up are warranted to ascertain whether the accuracy of robotic-assisted TKA can translate into better clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

multidisciplinary sciences
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot‐Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Jiazheng Xu,Liangliang Li,Jun Fu,Chi Xu,Ming Ni,Wei Chai,Libo Hao,Guoqiang Zhang,Jiying Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13323

2022-07-20

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:We compared the early clinical outcomes of the RA‐TKA and CM‐TKA groups through a prospective study. The advantages of RA‐TKA in terms of radiographic results as well as inflammatory indicators and the disadvantages of prolonging the surgery are described. Objective Robot‐assisted surgery has been promoted worldwide in recent years. The development of a domestic orthopaedic robot and its clinical application are therefore of great significance. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of domestic robot‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CM‐TKA). Methods A total of 77 patients who underwent primary single‐sided TKA from June to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled; resulting in the inclusion of 72 patients. The patients were randomly divided into the RA‐TKA group (37 cases, with TKA being assisted by the Yuanhua Orthopaedic Robotic System) and the CM‐TKA group (35 cases, with TKA being performed using conventional tools). Knee function was evaluated by the knee range of motion (ROM), the American Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Postoperative radiographic results were evaluated by full‐length weight‐bearing X‐rays of the lower limb and anteroposterior and lateral X‐rays of the knee were obtained preoperatively and at 90 days postoperative. The operative duration, blood loss, postoperative knee function, radiographic outcomes, and incidence of complications were compared by Student's t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test. Serum levels of inflammatory markers before the operation and 1, 3, and 30 days after the operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The operation was significantly longer in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group (154.3 vs 115.2 min, p 0.05). The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups. In the radiographic findings at 90 days postoperatively we found the frequency of lateral tibial component (LTC) angle outliers was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group (3.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003). The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group on day 1 after surgery (9.9 vs 12.7, p = 0.024). Conclusions RA‐TKA requires more time than CM‐TKA, which may be related to the learning curve and intraoperative registration. The short‐term postoperative knee functional outcomes had no differences between the two groups, and RA‐TKA improved the accuracy of tibial component alignment. Further follow‐up studies are required to investigate the long‐term outcomes.

orthopedics
A Newly Designed “skywalker” Robot Applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study for Femoral Rotational Alignment Restoration

Rui He,Mao-Lin Sun,Ran Xiong,Peng-Fei Yang,Kai Lei,Li-Ming Liu,Liu Yang,Lin Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13365

2022-01-01

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:Objective This study explored whether robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) has the advantage of restoring femoral rotational alignment compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty (COTKA). Methods Sixty patients (45 women and 15 men) attending our department from May 2019 to December 2020 were selected and divided into two groups, with 30 patients in each group, according to whether they underwent COTKA or RATKA. Femoral rotational alignment results, such as, posterior condylar angle (PCA), patella transverse axis‐femoral transepicondylar axis angle (PFA), radiological findings, such as, hip‐knee‐ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and operative data (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tourniquet time, and length of stay (LOS), and clinical outcomes, such as maximum knee flexion angle (MKFA), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Western Ontario Mac Master University Index Score (WOMAC) were compared within and between the two groups. Results PCA and PFA in the RATKA group were (0.6 ± 0.3)° and (0.9 ± 0.3)°, respectively, which were smaller than (1.5 ± 2.0)° and (3.1 ± 1.1)° in the COTKA group (P < 0.05), and were closer to 0°; the differences in HKA, LDFA, and MPTA were not statistically significant. With the exception of the LDFA, the HKA, MPTA, PCA, and PFA improved in both groups after surgery (P < 0.05). The blood loss and the LOS of RATKA group were 192.3 ± 23.1 mL and 8.2 ± 1.4 days, which were less than 203.7 ± 29.8 mL and 9.3 ± 1.1 days of the COTKA group, but the operation time showed no statistically significant difference, and the tourniquet time was longer (P < 0.05). The MKFA in the RATKA group was (123.0 ± 3.7)°, which was greater than (116.3 ± 4.6)° in the COTKA group (P < 0.05). In terms of scores, the postoperative results were better than the preoperative results in both groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion The accuracy of femoral rotational alignment reconstructed achieved by RATKA is significantly better than that of COTKA and is more conducive to the recovery of knee flexion function after surgery; although RATKA reduces intraoperative blood loss and postoperative LOS, the short‐term clinical efficacy comparison has not yet demonstrated the advantages of robotic technology, and a more optimized design is needed to improve the efficiency of RATKA surgery.
Adoption of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with Decreased Use of Articular Constraint and Manipulation under Anesthesia Compared to a Manual Approach

Jenny Zhang,Chelsea N Matzko,Andrew Sawires,Joseph O Ehiorobo,Michael A Mont,Matthew S Hepinstall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721123

Abstract:Haptic robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) seeks to leverage three-dimensional planning, intraoperative assessment of ligament laxity, and guided bone preparation to establish and achieve patient-specific targets for implant position. We sought to compare (1) operative details, (2) knee alignment, (3) recovery of knee function, and (4) complications during adoption of this technique to our experience with manual TKA. We compared 120 RATKAs performed between December 2016 and July 2018 to 120 consecutive manual TKAs performed between May 2015 and January 2017. Operative details, lengths of stay (LOS), and discharge dispositions were collected. Tibiofemoral angles, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and ranges of motion were assessed until 3 months postoperatively. Manipulations under anesthesia, complications, and reoperations were tabulated. Mean operative times were 22 minutes longer in RATKA (p < 0.001) for this early cohort, but decreased by 27 minutes (p < 0.001) from the first 25 RATKA cases to the last 25 RATKA cases. Less articular constraint was used to achieve stability in RATKA (93 vs. 55% cruciate-retaining, p < 0.001; 3 vs. 35% posterior stabilized (PS), p < 0.001; and 4 vs. 10% varus-valgus constrained, p_ = _0.127). RATKA had lower LOS (2.7 vs. 3.4 days, p < 0.001). Discharge dispositions, tibiofemoral angles, KSS, and knee flexion angles did not differ, but manipulations were less common in RATKAs (4 vs. 17%, p = 0.013). We observed less use of constraint, shorter LOS, and fewer manipulations under anesthesia in RATKA, with no increase in complications. Operative times were longer, particularly early in the learning curve, but improved with experience. All measured patient-centered outcomes were equivalent or favored the newer technique, suggesting that RATKA with patient-specific alignment targets does not compromise initial quality. Observed differences may relate to improved ligament balance or diminished need for ligament release.
No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Theofilos Karasavvidis,Cale A. Pagan,Eytan Debbi,David J. Mayman,Seth A. Jerabek,Jonathan M. Vigdorchik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.050

IF: 4.435

2024-03-28

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract:Background Individualized alignment techniques have gained major interest in an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative alignment between kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) and assess whether KA significantly deviates from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Methods There were 234 patients who underwent robotic-assisted TKA using an unrestricted KA and a strict MA technique (KA: 145, MA: 89). The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), and the resultant arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) were measured. The aHKA 0 indicated valgus knee alignment. The primary outcome was the frequency of cases that resulted in an aHKA of ± 4° of neutral (0°), as assessed on full-leg standing radiographs obtained at 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the change in coronal plane alignment of the knee classification (CPAK) type from preoperative to postoperative between the MA and KA groups. Results The mean preoperative aHKA was similar between the two groups (P = 0.19). The KA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -1.4 ± 2.4°, while the MA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -0.5 ± 2.1°. No significant difference in limb alignment was identified between KA and MA cases that resulted in HKA of ± 4° being neutral (91.7 versus 96.6%, P = 0.14). There were 97.2% of cases in the KA group that fell within the ± 5° range. The MA group was associated with a significantly higher rate of CPAK type change from pre- to post-operatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion Kinematic alignment achieved similar postoperative aHKA compared to MA, and thus did not significantly deviate from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Surgeons should feel comfortable starting to introduce individualized alignment techniques. Without being restricted by boundaries, postoperative alignment will be within 5 degrees of neutral 97% of the time.

orthopedics
Real-world accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its impact on expedited recovery

Wai Kit Wong,Azliana Abu Bakar Sajak,Hwa Sen Chua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02059-6

2024-08-06

Abstract:Despite total knee arthroplasty (TKA) being the gold standard for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, 20% of patients remain dissatisfied. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty promises unparalleled control of the accuracy of bone cuts, implant positioning, control of gap balance, and resultant hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis. Patients underwent clinical and radiological assessments, including knee CT scans and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), preoperatively. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-operatively, with imaging repeated at 6 weeks. A total of 155 patients underwent robotic-assisted TKA and have completed 3 months of follow-up. Mean pre-operative HKA axis was 7.39 ± 5.52 degrees varus, improving to 1.34 ± 2.22 degrees varus post-operatively. Restoration of HKA axis was 0.76 ± 1.9 degrees from intra-operative planning (p < 0.0005). Implant placement accuracy in the coronal plane was 0.08 ± 1.36 degrees (p = 0.458) for the femoral component and 0.71 ± 1.3 degrees (p < 0.0005) for the tibial component. Rotational alignment mean deviation was 0.39 ± 1.49 degrees (p = 0.001). Most patients (98.1%) had ≤ 2 mm difference in extension-flexion gaps. PROM scores showed improvement and exceeded pre-operative scores by 6 weeks post-surgery. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty provides precise control over traditionally subjective factors, demonstrating excellent early post-operative outcomes.Level of evidence Prospective observational study-II.

Radio Webs - Support Architecture for Mobile Web Access

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Knee replacement surgery is more precise with

[Should patients with idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis receive treatment or not?].

Functional alignment maximises advantages of robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty with better patient‐reported outcomes compared to mechanical alignment

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Restored the Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio and the Insall-Salvati Index Compared to the Manual Technique; A Cohort-Matched Study.

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty have a greater improvement in knee-specific pain but not in function

One-Year Patient Outcomes for Robotic-Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Robotic assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Robotic-arm assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty: Functional gait analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Improved Component Placement Accuracy with Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Better accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional technique in patients with failed high tibial osteotomy

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot‐Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

A Newly Designed “skywalker” Robot Applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study for Femoral Rotational Alignment Restoration

Adoption of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with Decreased Use of Articular Constraint and Manipulation under Anesthesia Compared to a Manual Approach

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Real-world accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its impact on expedited recovery