Overestimation of the Ischemic Core Is Associated With Higher Core Lesion Volume and Degree of Reperfusion After Thrombectomy

Gabriel Broocks,Lukas Meyer,Laurens Winkelmeier,Helge Kniep,Christian Heitkamp,Soren Christensen,Maarten G Lansberg,Christian Thaler,Andre Kemmling,Gerhard Schön,Kamil Zeleňák,Paul C Stracke,Gregory Albers,Jens Fiehler,Max Wintermark,Jeremy J Heit,Tobias D Faizy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.231750
IF: 19.7
Radiology
Abstract:Background CT perfusion (CTP)-derived baseline ischemic core volume (ICV) can overestimate the true extent of infarction, which may result in exclusion of patients with ischemic stroke from endovascular treatment (EVT). Purpose To determine whether ischemic core overestimation is associated with larger ICV and degree of recanalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with acute ischemic stroke triaged at multimodal CT who underwent EVT between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome was ischemic core overestimation, which was assumed when baseline CTP-derived ICV was larger than the final infarct volume at follow-up imaging. The secondary outcome was functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 90 days after EVT. Successful vessel recanalization was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher. Categorical variables were compared between patients with ICV of 50 mL or less versus large ICV greater than 50 mL with use of the χ2 test. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Results In total, 721 patients (median age, 76 years [IQR, 64-83 years]; 371 female) were included, of which 162 (22%) demonstrated ischemic core overestimation. Core overestimation occurred more often in patients with ICV greater than 50 mL versus 50 mL or less (48% vs 16%; P < .001) and those with successful versus unsuccessful vessel recanalization (26% vs 13%; P < .001). In an adjusted model, successful recanalization after EVT (odds ratio [OR], 3.14 [95% CI: 1.65, 5.95]; P < .001) and larger ICV (OR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02, 1.04]; P < .001) were independently associated with core overestimation, while the time from symptom onset to imaging showed no association (OR, 0.99; P = .96). Core overestimation was independently associated with functional independence (adjusted OR, 2.83 [95% CI: 1.66, 4.81]; P < .001) after successful recanalization. Conclusion Ischemic core overestimation occurred more frequently in patients presenting with large CTP-derived ICV and successful vessel recanalization compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?