Abstract:Abstract Introduction Current literature supports hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) as a treatment option for select patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, in about a third of implanted patients, HNS is ineffective. To date, few publications have investigated how sleep position impacts HNS efficacy. In 2019, the Stanford group found that HNS had a greater impact on non-supine AHI vs supine AHI; the data was limited to eleven patients monitored in the sleep lab and did not incorporate full-night data. We explored the effect of sleep position on HNS efficacy in a larger sample by comparing pre- and post-operative overnight sleep studies. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 136 patients implanted at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2016-2023. Patients were included if they tolerated therapeutic voltage and completed pre- and post-operative sleep studies with at least 30 minutes of supine and non-supine sleep. Mean differences in pre- and post-operative overall AHI4% (DeltaAHI), supine AHI4% (DeltaSupine) and non-supine AHI4% (DeltaNon-supine) were calculated. Paired T-Test was then performed to compare AHI4% percent reduction when supine versus non-supine. Secondary outcomes included mean difference in pre- and post-operative ODI4 (DeltaODI) and ESS (DeltaESS). We also calculated our cohort’s surgical success rate, as defined by Sher’s criteria. Results Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 60.2+/-11.2 years, and 15 patients were male (88.2%). Mean BMI was 29.1+/-3.0 kg/m2. Mean preoperative AHI4% was 29.4+/-14.8 events/hour; mean preoperative supine AHI4% and non-supine AHI4% were 44.6 events/hour and 13.3 events/hour respectively. Overall DeltaAHI was 15.2 events/hour (p=0.0004), DeltaSupine was 21.4 events/hour (p=0.0071), and DeltaNon-supine was 6.2 events/hour (p=0.0486). Despite the difference in absolute reduction, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.3242) between the percent reduction of supine AHI4% (41.7%) versus non-supine AHI4% (10.0%). Mean differences for DeltaODI and DeltaESS were 11.5 (p=0.0051) and 2.9 (p=0.2) respectively. Overall success rate was 58.8% (10 of 17 patients), which is similar to other studies in the literature. Conclusion In our sample, we found no difference in AHI percent reduction between supine and non-supine position, suggesting that HNS is effective in improving OSA regardless of positionality. Support (if any) NCATS: TL1TR004420;

Comparative analysis of pain outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation: Avoiding the digastric tendon

0594 Novel Device to Simulate Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Response to Predict Surgical Success

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy Outcomes in Apnea- Versus Hypopnea-Predominant Patients

Treatment Outcomes in Awake Endoscopy With Advanced Programming in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation

Safety and effectiveness in explantation and re-implantation of hypoglossal nerve stimulation devices

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

0589 Evaluating the Impact of Sleep Position on Efficacy of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation

How we measure hypoglossal nerve stimulator outcome matters: titration versus single amplitude efficacy sleep studies

0595 Tolerability and Activation Parameters Between Early vs Routine Activation of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy

Implementing a Streamlined Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Pathway: Cost, Time to Surgery, and Outcomes

0588 Combination Therapy: Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation and Oral Appliance Therapy

1200 Overstimulated: A Case of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Over-titration

Immediate Postoperative Changes After Expansion Pharyngoplasty and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation

Exploring hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A comprehensive review of clinical and physiological upper airway outcomes

The Impact of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation on Secondary Health Outcomes

Comparison of Home Sleep Devices and Sleep Study Testing in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Patients

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation over-titration

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation explantation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea – a systematic review

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea

0590 Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for OSA – a Systematic Review of Adverse Events in Clinical Trials & Real-world-data

Are There Hidden Adverse Events in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation: Comparing Social Media and a Federal Database