AP-1000 fuel assembly performance with UO2 and UO2/U3Si2 fuels and silicon carbide cladding from the viewpoint of neutronics

Farrokh Khoshahval
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2024.2356701
2024-05-24
Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects
Abstract:Accident Tolerate Fuels have been highly researched since the Fukushima disaster. To improve the safety of the AP-1000 fuel assembly, an advanced fuel, UO 2 /U 3 Si 2, is considered. In addition, the silicon carbide (SiC) cladding that has the capability of reducing oxidation is compared with the baseline Zircaloy for AP-1000 fuel assembly along with the two different fuel cases (UO 2 and UO 2 -U 3 Si 2 ). The present study focuses on the neutronic performance of the UO 2 /U 3 Si 2 fuel and thus the main neutronic parameters such as the fuel cycle length, pin power distribution, atom density evolution of main isotopes, and the reactivity feedback coefficients are evaluated. An increase of 6.72% in the criticality period is introduced when 70%UO 2 -30%U 3 Si 2 fuel with SiC cladding is considered. The pin power peaking factors, fuel temperature coefficients, and moderator temperature coefficients of the proposed fuel result in very few changes. For instance, the maximum pin power distribution difference between 70%UO 2 -30%U 3 Si 2 and UO 2 fuel with SiC cladding is 0.001, which is negligible. Thus, its performance is as good as the traditional UO 2 fuel from the neutronic aspects and controlling power distribution.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?