Abstract:The past three decades have witnessed notable success in designing efficient SAT solvers, with modern solvers capable of solving industrial benchmarks containing millions of variables in just a few seconds. The success of modern SAT solvers owes to the widely-used CDCL algorithm, which lacks comprehensive theoretical investigation. Furthermore, it has been observed that CDCL solvers still struggle to deal with specific classes of benchmarks comprising only hundreds of variables, which contrasts with their widespread use in real-world applications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to uncover the inner workings of these seemingly weak yet powerful black boxes. In this paper, we present a first step towards this goal by introducing an approach called CausalSAT, which employs causal reasoning to gain insights into the functioning of modern SAT solvers. CausalSAT initially generates observational data from the execution of SAT solvers and learns a structured graph representing the causal relationships between the components of a SAT solver. Subsequently, given a query such as whether a clause with low literals blocks distance (LBD) has a higher clause utility, CausalSAT calculates the causal effect of LBD on clause utility and provides an answer to the question. We use CausalSAT to quantitatively verify hypotheses previously regarded as "rules of thumb" or empirical findings such as the query above. Moreover, CausalSAT can address previously unexplored questions, like which branching heuristic leads to greater clause utility in order to study the relationship between branching and clause management. Experimental evaluations using practical benchmarks demonstrate that CausalSAT effectively fits the data, verifies four "rules of thumb", and provides answers to three questions closely related to implementing modern solvers.

All-SAT Using Minimal Blocking Clauses

Accelerating All-SAT Computation with Short Blocking Clauses.

Computing Minimal Sets on Propositional Formulae I: Problems & Reductions

Disjoint Projected Enumeration for SAT and SMT without Blocking Clauses

Solving SAT Problem with Boolean Algebra.

Improved Algorithm of Unsatisfiability-based Maximum Satisfiability.

An Algorithm to Compute Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets for a Decidable Fragment of First-Order Formulas

Improving Lower Bounds in MAXSAT Complete Algorithm Based Optimizing Inconsistent Set

Disjoint Partial Enumeration without Blocking Clauses

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

An Efficient Resolution Based Algorithm for SAT

A Graphical #SAT Algorithm for Formulae with Small Clause Density

Implementing Efficient All Solutions SAT Solvers

Enhance SAT Conflict Analysis for Model Checking

Computing maximal autarkies with few and simple oracle queries

Maximum And- vs. Even-SAT

Deriving All Minimal Conflict Sets Using Satisfiability Algorithms

Minimizing counterexample with unit core extraction and incremental SAT

Solving SAT Problems by Orthogonal Method

New Worst-Case Upper Bound for #2-SAT and #3-SAT with the Number of Clauses As the Parameter.

An Efficient Method to Transform SAT Problems to Binary Integer Linear Programming Problem.