Evaluation of hepatic injury in chronic hepatitis B and C using APRI and FIB-4 indices compared to fibroscan results

Narges Najafi,Alireza Razavi,Hamed Jafarpour,Maedeh Raei,Zahra Azizi,Lotfollah Davoodi,Amirsaleh Abdollahi,Mehran Frouzanian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002095
2024-05-15
Abstract:Background: Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C viruses (HCV) are significant causes of liver disease worldwide. Liver fibrosis (LF) is a complication of chronic liver damage caused by HBV and HCV due to our limited knowledge comparing the diagnostic performance of platelet to aspartate aminotransferase ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index with fibroscan. Methods: This study evaluated liver damage in HBV and HCV using APRI, FIB-4, and fibroscan indices. This retrospective cohort descriptive-analytical study was conducted on patients with HBV and HCV. This study uses laboratory results and imaging to investigate liver damage in chronic HBV and HCV patients. APRI and FIB-4 were computed based on laboratory results. Results: A total of 185 patients (82 hepatitis B and 103 hepatitis C) were included in the study. Thirteen patients had liver cirrhosis. There was no statistically significant difference between the fibroscan results in the two groups (P=0.99). The HBV group's mean APRI and FIB-4 were lower than HCV, but no significant difference was observed (P>0.05). Our results in HBV and HCV patients showed that APRI and FIB-4 accomplished well anticipating cirrhosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.771-0.845 and 0.871-0.910, respectively. Conclusion: Fibroscan is a powerful tool superior to APRI and FIB-4 in predicting LF and cirrhosis. Nevertheless, APRI and FIB-4 are inexpensive and non-invasive indicators with acceptable efficacy in predicting advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. However, these two measures are not reliable in low-grade fibrosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?