Conducting interfaces between amorphous oxide layers and SrTiO3(110) and SrTiO3(111)

Mateusz Scigaj,Jaume Gázquez,María Varela,Josep Fontcuberta,Gervasi Herranz,Florencio Sánchez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2015.09.002
IF: 3.699
2015-11-01
Solid State Ionics
Abstract:Interfaces between (110) and (111)SrTiO3 (STO) single crystalline substrates and amorphous oxide layers, LaAlO3 (a-LAO), Y:ZrO2 (a-YSZ), and SrTiO3 (a-STO) become conducting above a critical thickness tc. Here we show that tc for a-LAO does not depend on the substrate orientation, i.e. tc (a-LAO/(110)STO)≈tc(a-LAO/(111)STO) interfaces, whereas it strongly depends on the composition of the amorphous oxide: tc(a-LAO/(110)STO)<tc(a-YSZ/(110)STO)<tc(a-STO/(110)STO). It is concluded that the formation of oxygen vacancies in amorphous-type interfaces is mainly determined by the oxygen affinity of the deposited metal ions, rather than orientation-dependent enthalpy vacancy formation and diffusion. Scanning transmission microscopy characterization of amorphous and crystalline LAO/STO(110) interfaces shows much higher amount of oxygen vacancies in the former, providing experimental evidence of the distinct mechanism of conduction in these interfaces.
chemistry, physical,physics, condensed matter
What problem does this paper attempt to address?