Abstract:We evaluated the repositioning accuracy of a commercially available stereotactic whole body immobilization system (BodyFIX, Medical Intelligence, Schwabmuenchen, Germany) in 36 patients treated by hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy. CT data were acquired for positional control of patient and tumor before each fraction of the treatment course. Those control CT datasets were compared with the original treatment planning CT simulation and analyzed with respect to positional misalignment of bony patient anatomy, and the respective position of the treated small lung or liver lesions. We assessed the stereotactic coordinates of distinct bony anatomical landmarks in the original CT and each control dataset. In addition, the target isocenter was recorded in the planning CT simulation dataset. An iterative optimization algorithm was implemented, utilizing a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomical landmark measurements relative to the original treatment planning CT data set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y and z-components of translation of the patient's body and the target's center-of-mass for each control CT study, as well as rotation about the principal room axes in the respective CT data sets. In addition to absolute patient/target translation, the total magnitude vector of patient and target misalignment was calculated. A clinical assessment determined whether or not the assigned planning target volume safety margins would have provided the desired target coverage. To this end, each control CT study was co-registered with the original treatment planning study using immobilization system related fiducial markers, and the computed isodose calculation was superimposed. In 109 control setup CT scans available for comparison with their respective treatment planning CT simulation study (2-5 per patient, median 3), anatomical landmark analysis revealed a mean bony landmark translation of -0.4 +/- 3.9 (mean +/- SD), -0.1 +/- 1.6 and 0.3 +/- 3.6 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. Bony landmark setup deviations along one or more principal axis larger than 5 mm were observed in 32 control CT studies (29.4%). Body rotations about the x-, y- and z-axis were 0.9 +/- 0.7, 0.8 +/- 0.7 and 1.8 +/- 1.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming a rigid body relationship of target and bony anatomy, the mean computed absolute target translation was 2.9 +/- 3.3, 2.3 +/- 2.5 and 3.2 +/- 2.7 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. The median and mean magnitude vector of target isocenter displacement was computed to be 4.9 mm, and 5.7 +/- 3.7 mm. Clinical assessment of PTV/target volume coverage revealed 72 (66.1%), 23 (21.1%), and 14 (12.8%), of excellent (100% isodose coverage), good (>90% isodose coverage), and poor GTV/isodose alignment quality (less than 90% isodose coverage to some aspect of the GTV), respectively. Loss of target volume dose coverage was correlated with translations >5 mm along one or more axes (p<0.0001), rotations >3 degrees about the z-axis (p=0.0007) and body mass index >30 (p<0.0001). The analyzed BodyFIX whole body immobilization system performed favorably compared with other stereotactic body immobilization systems for which peer-reviewed repositioning data exist. While the measured variability in patient and target setup provided clinically acceptable setup accuracy in the vast majority of cases, larger setup deviations were occasional observed. Such deviations constitute a potential for partial target underdosing warranting, in our opinion, a pre-delivery positional assessment procedure (e.g., pre-treatment control CT scan).

Comparing immobilisation devices in gynaecological external beam radiotherapy: improving inter-fraction reproducibility of pelvic tilt

A randomised comparison of three different immobilisation devices for thoracic and abdominal cancers

Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available double-vacuum whole body immobilization system for stereotactic body radiation therapy

A comparison of two immobilization systems for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors

Comparison of the effectiveness of different immobilization systems in different body regions using daily megavoltage CT in helical tomotherapy

Intra-fraction and Inter-fraction analysis of a dedicated immobilization device for intracranial radiation treatment

SU-E-J-29: Evaluation of Effectiveness of Immobilization Devices for Radiation Therapy with Repeated CBCT Studies

Comparison of setup accuracy and efficiency between the Klarity system and BodyFIX system for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

The clinical effect of Body-Fix(R) device in improving the positioning accuracy of the hypofractionated radiotherapy in the vertebral metastatic patients

A randomized comparison of interfraction and intrafraction prostate motion with and without abdominal compression

Influence of patient's physiologic factors and immobilization choice with stereotactic body radiotherapy for upper lung tumors

Impact of belly board immobilization devices and body mass factor on setup displacement using daily cone‐beam CT in rectal cancer radiotherapy

Clinical Benefits of New Immobilization System for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Intrahepatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Helical Tomotherapy.

Transmission study of the Abdominal Compression plate (BodyFIX Diaphragm Control) for abdominal and stereotactic body radiotherapy

Positioning accuracy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy patients determined by on-treatment cone-beam CT imaging

Comparative analysis of different fixation methods for rectal cancer patients with pelvic radiotherapy based on 6-DOF bed

Evaluation of kidney motion and target localization in abdominal SBRT patients

Reproducibility of patient setup in the seated treatment position: A novel treatment chair design

Choice of immobilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung tumor patient by BMI