Abstract:Background: Additive manufacturing (three-dimensional (3D) printing) has become a leading manufacturing technique in dentistry due to its various advantages. However, its potential applications for dental ceramics are still being explored. Zirconia, among ceramics, has increasing popularity and applications in dentistry mostly due to its excellent properties. Although subtractive manufacturing (3D milling) is considered the most advanced technology for the fabrication of zirconia restorations, certain disadvantages are associated with it. Methods: A systematic review was piloted to compare the clinical performance of zirconium crowns that were fabricated using three-dimensional (3D) milling and 3D printing. A meta-analysis was performed, and studies published up to November 2022 were identified. The terms searched were “Zirconium crowns”, “3D printing”, “CAD/CAM” (Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing), “Milling”, “dental crowns”, and “3D milling”. The characteristics that were compared were the year in which the study was published, study design, age of the patient, country, the number of crowns, the type of crown fabrication, marginal integrity, caries status, and outcomes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to structure this systematic review. Out of eleven hundred and fifty titles identified after a primary search, nine articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The research question based on PICO/PECO (Participant, Intervention/exposure, Comparison, and Outcome) was “Do 3D-printed and milled (P) zirconia crowns and FDPs (I) have a better survival rate (O) when conventional prosthesis is also an option (C)”? The data collected were tabulated and compared, and the risk of bias and meta-analysis were later performed. Only nine articles (clinical research) were selected for the study. Since there were no clinical studies on the 3D printing of zirconium crowns, six in vitro studies were considered for the comparison. Zirconium crowns in the milling group had an average minimum follow-up of 6 months. Results: A moderate risk of bias was found, and survival was significant. A high heterogeneity level was noted among the studies. Marginal integrity, periodontal status, and survival rate were high. Linear regression depicted no statistical correlation between the type of cement used and the survival rate. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the milled crowns had a higher performance and satisfactory clinical survival.

Accuracy and adaptation of one-piece endodontic crowns fabricated through 3D printing and milling

Accuracy and Margin Quality of Advanced 3D-Printed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.

Effect of Machining Method and Margin Design on the Accuracy and Margin Quality of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns

Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study

Trueness and precision of digital light processing fabricated 3D printed monolithic zirconia crowns

3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: Trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects.

Accuracy of Zirconia Crowns Manufactured by Stereolithography with an Occlusal Full-Supporting Structure: an in Vitro Study.

Assessment of the trueness of additively manufactured mol3% zirconia crowns at different printing orientations with an industrial and desktop 3D printer compared to subtractive manufacturing.

Comparing the accuracy of crown fitting between milling and 3D printing techniques using CAD/CAM technologies

Evaluation of Accuracy of Different Print Angulations for 3D Printed Dental Crowns

Fit comparison of interim crowns manufactured with open and proprietary 3D printing modes versus milling technology: An in vitro study

Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies

Accuracy (trueness and precision) evaluation of zirconia crown manufactured using stereolithography and digital light processing

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Internal Adaptations of Crowns Cast from Resin Patterns Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer- Assisted Manufacturing Technologies

Surface trueness and precision of interim restorations fabricated by digital light processing and CAD-CAM milling systems

Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of a single crown fabricated based on a three-dimensional printed model

Clinical evaluation of 3D-printed zirconia crowns fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) for posterior teeth restorations: Short-term pilot study

Zirconia crowns manufactured using digital light processing: Effects of printing angle and layer thickness on the accuracy

Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses

Clinical Effectiveness of 3D-Milled and 3D-Printed Zirconia Prosthesis—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Accuracy of Post and Core Fabricated with Digital Technology