Abstract:When animals and humans make decisions based on their sensory input, they often rely on multiple cues at once. These provide complementary sources of information, which can help overcome ambiguity and noise, and increase the accuracy of decisions. While most studies have focused on the benefits of multimodal and within-modal integration for learning and decision making, their costs have received less attention. Processing multiple inputs, and learning and memorizing them requires more neural resources than single cues, and might also require more time. When a decision can be made with high accuracy based on a single cue alone, adhering and memorizing multiple ones simultaneously might thus concur higher costs than benefits, and not be an optimal decision-making strategy. In this study, we tested if insects trade-off the costs and benefits of learning multiple cues in a foraging task, using the buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris. To maximize comparability between cues, we presented combinations of visual-only features, such as are found on natural flowers: colours of varying discriminability, paired with shapes or patterns. We found that the bees relied exclusively on colours when these were easy to discriminate, and did not learn pattern or shape features presented simultaneously. With harder to discriminate colours, the bees learned both colour and shape or pattern features. Our results demonstrate that bumblebees flexibly adjust their learning strategies when presented with visual features of varying discriminability, to balance the costs and benefits of multi-cue learning. Our analysis of the learning rates of the bees with multi- and single attribute stimuli suggests that blocking could serve as a mechanism to implement this strategy switch. These results shed light on trade-offs in learning and decision making with multiple cues, and can directly be compared to studies in other insects, animals and humans.

Inferential reasoning abilities in wild-caught bumblebees

Reasoning by exclusion in the kea (Nestor notabilis)

Inferential reasoning by exclusion in children (Homo sapiens).

Inference in wolves and dogs: The “cups task”, revisited

Grey parrots use inferential reasoning based on acoustic cues alone

Reasoning by exclusion in food-caching Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius)

The emergence of reasoning by the disjunctive syllogism in early childhood

How honey bees make fast and accurate decisions

How can I find what I want? Can children, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys form abstract representations to guide their behavior in a sampling task?

Bumblebees flexibly adjust learning and decision strategies to sensory information content in a foraging task

The relationship between preference and switching in flower foraging by bees

The development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy

Economic foraging in a floral marketplace: asymmetrically dominated decoy effects in bumblebees

Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities

Odor Discrimination after Olfactory Conditioning of Managed Solitary Bees, Osmia Lignaria and Megachile Rotundata

Traplining in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): a foraging strategy's ontogeny and the importance of spatial reference memory in short-range foraging

Inferring Unseen Causes: Developmental and Evolutionary Origins

Different effects of reward value and saliency during bumblebee visual search for multiple rewarding targets

Wild bumblebees use both absolute and relative evaluation when foraging

Bumblebees show unique human behaviour

Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees