Abstract:When animals and humans make decisions based on their sensory input, they often rely on multiple cues at once. These provide complementary sources of information, which can help overcome ambiguity and noise, and increase the accuracy of decisions. While most studies have focused on the benefits of multimodal and within-modal integration for learning and decision making, their costs have received less attention. Processing multiple inputs, and learning and memorizing them requires more neural resources than single cues, and might also require more time. When a decision can be made with high accuracy based on a single cue alone, adhering and memorizing multiple ones simultaneously might thus concur higher costs than benefits, and not be an optimal decision-making strategy. In this study, we tested if insects trade-off the costs and benefits of learning multiple cues in a foraging task, using the buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris. To maximize comparability between cues, we presented combinations of visual-only features, such as are found on natural flowers: colours of varying discriminability, paired with shapes or patterns. We found that the bees relied exclusively on colours when these were easy to discriminate, and did not learn pattern or shape features presented simultaneously. With harder to discriminate colours, the bees learned both colour and shape or pattern features. Our results demonstrate that bumblebees flexibly adjust their learning strategies when presented with visual features of varying discriminability, to balance the costs and benefits of multi-cue learning. Our analysis of the learning rates of the bees with multi- and single attribute stimuli suggests that blocking could serve as a mechanism to implement this strategy switch. These results shed light on trade-offs in learning and decision making with multiple cues, and can directly be compared to studies in other insects, animals and humans.

Traplining in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): a foraging strategy's ontogeny and the importance of spatial reference memory in short-range foraging

Flower revisitation by foraging bumble bees: the effects of landmarks and floral arrangement

Trapline foraging by nectar-collecting hornets

A comparative analysis of foraging route development by bumblebees and honey bees

Bumble Bees (Bombus terrestris) Use Time-Memory to Associate Reward with Color and Time of Day

High experience levels delay recruitment but promote simultaneous time-memories in honey bee foragers

Bumblebees increase their learning flight altitude in dense environments

Way-finding in displaced clock-shifted bees proves bees use a cognitive map

Route retracing: way pointing and multiple vector memories in trail-following ants

Bumblebees flexibly adjust learning and decision strategies to sensory information content in a foraging task

Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees

Landmark knowledge overrides optic flow in honeybee waggle dance distance estimation

Switching perspective: Comparing ground-level and bird’s-eye views for bees navigating clutter

Multimodal cues provide redundant information for bumblebees when the stimulus is visually salient, but facilitate red target detection in a naturalistic background

The Innate Responses of Bumble Bees to Flower Patterns: Separating the Nectar Guide from the Nectary Changes Bee Movements and Search Time

Learning modifies attention during bumblebee visual search

Bumblebees perceive the spatial layout of their environment in relation to their body size and form to minimize inflight collisions

Inexperienced bumble bees are poor at securely landing regardless of flower orientation or presence of labellum

Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees

The relationship between preference and switching in flower foraging by bees

Wild bumblebees use both absolute and relative evaluation when foraging