Abstract:Abstract Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flowers to feed on and which to ignore. Working with real flowers poses logistical challenges due to correlations between flower traits, maintenance costs and uncontrolled variables. Here, we overcome this challenge by designing multimodal artificial flowers that varied in visual, olfactory and reward attributes. We used artificial flowers to investigate the impact of seven floral attributes (three visual cues, two olfactory cues and two rewarding attributes) on flower visitation and species richness. We investigated how flower attributes influenced two phases of the decision‐making process: the decision to land on a flower, and the decision to feed on a flower. Artificial flowers attracted 890 individual insects representing 15 morphospecies spanning seven arthropod orders. Honeybees were the most common visitors accounting for 46% of visitors. Higher visitation rates were driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool, flower shape and flower colour and was negatively impacted by the presence of citral. Species richness was driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool and flower colour. For hymenopterans, the probability of landing on the artificial flowers was influenced by the presence of nectar or pollen, shape and the presence of citral and/or linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained nectar. For dipterans, the probability of landing on artificial flowers increased when the flower was yellow and contained linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained pollen, nectar and linalool. Our results demonstrate the multi‐attribute nature of flower preferences and highlight the usefulness of artificial flowers as tools for studying flower visitation in wild insects.

Flower revisitation by foraging bumble bees: the effects of landmarks and floral arrangement

Traplining in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): a foraging strategy's ontogeny and the importance of spatial reference memory in short-range foraging

Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees

Multimodal cues provide redundant information for bumblebees when the stimulus is visually salient, but facilitate red target detection in a naturalistic background

A comparative analysis of foraging route development by bumblebees and honey bees

The Innate Responses of Bumble Bees to Flower Patterns: Separating the Nectar Guide from the Nectary Changes Bee Movements and Search Time

Inexperienced bumble bees are poor at securely landing regardless of flower orientation or presence of labellum

Different effects of reward value and saliency during bumblebee visual search for multiple rewarding targets

Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees

Learning modifies attention during bumblebee visual search

Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects

Nectar discovery speeds and multimodal displays: assessing nectar search times in bees with radiating and non-radiating guides

Wild bumblebees use both absolute and relative evaluation when foraging

Developing and Evaluating a New Method and Apparatus for Examining Bumble Bee Foraging Behavior

The relationship between preference and switching in flower foraging by bees

When should bees be flower constant? An agent-based model highlights the importance of social information and foraging conditions

Testing the peak-end rule in bumblebees: lack of preference for a higher-reward sequence when the final reward is disappointing

Foraging bee species differentially prioritize quantity and quality of floral rewards

Flower Visitation through the Lens: Exploring the Foraging Behaviour of Bombus terrestris with a Computer Vision-Based Application

Revisiting Aristotle's observation on bees: High floral constancy is common among bees but it is shaped by the locally abundant flowering species

Trapline foraging by nectar-collecting hornets