Elucidation of the association between additional distal femoral resection and extension angle improvement following the actual surgical steps with the Robot-TKA system

Ryosuke Hishimura,Koji Iwasaki,Yuki Suzuki,Masatake Matsuoka,Tomohiro Onodera,Eiji Kondo,Norimasa Iwasaki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2024.05.007
Abstract:Background: This study investigates the association between additional distal femoral resection and improved flexion contracture in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a robot-assisted system. Flexion contracture is a common issue in patients with knee osteoarthritis, which causes postoperative complications and functional limitations. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of additional bone resection in flexion contracture correction and knee extension angle improvement after the actual surgical steps. Methods: The study included 11 patients who underwent posterior-stabilized (PS)-type TKA with a robot-assisted system. The surgical technique consisted of precise bone resection and range of motion evaluation using a navigation system. A precut technique was used to facilitate posterior access and remove osteophytes that cause the contracture. The amount of additional distal femoral resection was determined based on the thickness of the insert trial required for achieving full extension. Results: The flexion contracture correction angle and the amount of additional distal femoral resection demonstrated a linear relationship. An average of 2.0° with the standard error (SE) of 0.6° improvement in flexion contracture was observed per 1.0 mm of additional bone resection. The postoperative evaluation demonstrated a significant improvement in knee extension angle, thereby reducing the contracture degree. Conclusion: This study was the first to perform the additional distal femoral resection on the living knee, which closely replicates the actual surgical steps. The current study revealed that an additional 1.0 mm of distal femoral resection in PS-type TKA improves knee extension angle by 2.0° (SE 0.6°) within an additional resection range of 1.0 mm to 3.3 mm.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?