Enhanced perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) degradation by electrochemical activation of peroxydisulfate (PDS) during electrooxidation for water treatment

Melvin S Samuel,Govindan Kadarkarai,Donald R Ryan,Sean T McBeath,Brooke K Mayer,Patrick J McNamara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173736
2024-09-10
Abstract:Improved treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in water is critically important in light of the proposed United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) drinking water regulations at ng L-1 levels. The addition of peroxymonosulfate (PMS) during electrooxidation (EO) can remove and destroy PFAS, but ng L-1 levels have not been tested, and PMS itself can be toxic. The objective of this research was to test peroxydisulfate (PDS, an alternative to PMS) activation by boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) degradation. The influence of PDS concentration, temperature, and environmental water matrix effects, and PFOA concentration on PDS-EO performance were systematically examined. Batch reactor experiments revealed that 99 % of PFOA was degraded and 69 % defluorination was achieved, confirming PFOA mineralization. Scavenging experiments implied that sulfate radicals (SO4-) and hydroxyl radicals (HO) played a more important role for PFOA degradation than 1O2 or electrons (e-). Further identification of PFOA degradation and transformation products by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis established plausible PFOA degradation pathways. The analysis corroborates that direct electron transfers at the electrode initiate PFOA oxidation and SO4- improves overall treatment by cleaving the CC bond between the C7F15 and COOH moieties in PFOA, leading to possible products such as C7F15 and F-. The perfluoroalkyl radicals can be oxidized by SO4- and HO, resulting in the formation of shorter chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (e.g., perfluorobutanoic acid [PFBA]), with eventual mineralization to CO2 and F-. At an environmentally relevant low initial concentration of 100 ng L-1 PFOA, 99 % degradation was achieved. The degradation of PFOA was slightly affected by the water matrix as less removal was observed in an environmental river water sample (91 %) compared to tests conducted in Milli-Q water (99 %). Overall, EO with PDS provided a destructive approach for the elimination of PFOA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?