Records of the riverine discharge of 129I in riverbank sediment after the Fukushima accident

Takahiro Nakanishi,Kazuyuki Sakuma,Takuya Ohyama,Hiroki Hagiwara,Takashi Suzuki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124213
2024-08-15
Abstract:Although 129I discharge from watersheds is fundamental for assessing long-term radiation effects on aquatic ecosystems, 129I originating from the Fukushima nuclear accident is yet be evaluated. This study investigated the transport behavior of 129I by riverbank surveys conducted from 2013 to 2015 in a watershed where the 129I/137Cs activity ratio is low in the mountainous area and high in the plain as of 2011. Until 2015, the 129I/137Cs activity ratio of the levee crown in the studied watershed was similar to that of the surrounding area in 2011. However, the 129I/137Cs ratios of the surface riverbank sediments were all low, indicating that radionuclides transported from the mountainous area were deposited on the riverbank in the plain. The vertical distribution of the 129I/137Cs ratio in the riverbank sediments indicated that some 129I and 137Cs deposited during the accident remained in the lower layers, but most were eroded immediately after the accident. Based on the 129I/137Cs ratios of sediments deposited on the riverbank, which remained constant until 2015 after the accident, the amount of 129I discharged to the ocean was determined from the previously evaluated 137Cs discharge. It was calculated that 1.8 × 105 Bq and 1.2 × 107 Bq of 129I were discharged with sediment from the studied watershed and the contaminated river watersheds (Abukuma River and Fukushima coastal rivers, including the study river), respectively. This amount of 129I was 0.3% of the 129I released from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant into the ocean immediately after the accident. Furthermore, a comparison of the 129I/137Cs ratio showed that the continuous 129I and 137Cs discharge from the river contribute little to their amount in the seafloor sediments along the Fukushima coast.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?