From simulation to surgery, advancements and challenges in robotic training for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review
Marco Ticonosco,Alessandro Pissavini,Claudia Collà Ruvolo,Nicola Frego,Mario Belmonte,Francesco Barletta,Simone Morra,Silvia Rebuffo,Gabriele Sorce,Florencio Marin,Davide Campobasso,Anthony G Gallagher,Stefania Ferretti,Lorenzo Bianchi,Riccardo Schiavina,Stefano Puliatti,Salvatore Micali,Alexandre Mottrie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-14
Abstract:Background and objective: The landscape of surgical training is undergoing transformative changes, especially in the realm of robot-assisted procedures like radical prostatectomy (RARP). This narrative review explores the evolving methodologies and innovations in RARP training, emphasizing the shift from traditional training approaches, such as the Halsted method, to more scientific methods like proficiency-based progression (PBP). The rationale for the review stems from the increased adoption of robot-assisted surgery and the resulting increase in associated adverse events reported in the United States. The Patient Safety in Robotic Surgery (SAFROS) project initiated by the European Commission of the World Health Organization emphasized the importance of structured training programs for robotic surgeons. However, the review points out the limited availability of standardized curricula for RARP training, leading to non-homogeneous training worldwide. Methods: PubMed was searched primarily for the following topics: training AND robotic AND prostatectomy; robotic training AND prostatectomy AND learning; simulator AND robotic AND prostatectomy. Literature was selected based on historical significance and landmark studies as well as publications published after 2000. References from select studies were additionally included. Key content and findings: The advent of robotic surgery, especially in RARP, demands unique skills necessitating specialized training. The review delves into the diverse stages of robotic surgery training, starting with e-learning and progressing through virtual reality simulators, dry and wet laboratories, culminating in modular console training. Each training stage plays a critical role, addressing the challenges posed by new technologies and tools. Conclusions: The ever-evolving landscape of surgical training underscores the critical need for globally standardized, effective, and accessible programs. PBP emerges as a promising methodology, and technological advancements open new possibilities for telementoring via platforms like 5G. This review emphasizes the imperative to equip surgeons with the requisite skills for intricate procedures like RARP, addressing current challenges while anticipating the future developments in this dynamic field.