MP39-09 STRUCTURED TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR ROBOTIC RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: A DELPHI CONSENSUS STUDY
Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam,Alireza Ghoreifi,Zhenjie Wu,Firas Abdollah,Alessandro Antonelli,Daniel D. Eun,Shengjie Guo,Andrew J. Hung,Lulin Ma,Vitaly Margulis,Surena F. Matin,Reza Mehrazin,James Porter,Aaron Potretzke,Benjamin Pradere,Morgan Roupret,Thomas Seisen,Shahrokh F. Shariat,Giuseppe Simone,Robert J. Stein,Long Wang,Jitao Wu,Evanguelos Xylinas,Lin Yao,Homayoun Zargar,Riccardo Autorino,Giovanni E. Cacciamani,Hooman Djaladat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0001008644.01945.6c.09
2024-01-01
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyEducation Research II (MP39)1 May 2024MP39-09 STRUCTURED TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR ROBOTIC RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: A DELPHI CONSENSUS STUDY Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Alireza Ghoreifi, Zhenjie Wu, Firas Abdollah, Alessandro Antonelli, Daniel D. Eun, Shengjie Guo, Andrew J. Hung, Lulin Ma, Vitaly Margulis, Surena F. Matin, Reza Mehrazin, James Porter, Aaron Potretzke, Benjamin Pradere, Morgan Roupret, Thomas Seisen, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Giuseppe Simone, Robert J. Stein, Long Wang, Jitao Wu, Evanguelos Xylinas, Lin Yao, Homayoun Zargar, Riccardo Autorino, Giovanni E. Cacciamani, and Hooman Djaladat Farshad Sheybaee MoghaddamFarshad Sheybaee Moghaddam , Alireza GhoreifiAlireza Ghoreifi , Zhenjie WuZhenjie Wu , Firas AbdollahFiras Abdollah , Alessandro AntonelliAlessandro Antonelli , Daniel D. EunDaniel D. Eun , Shengjie GuoShengjie Guo , Andrew J. HungAndrew J. Hung , Lulin MaLulin Ma , Vitaly MargulisVitaly Margulis , Surena F. MatinSurena F. Matin , Reza MehrazinReza Mehrazin , James PorterJames Porter , Aaron PotretzkeAaron Potretzke , Benjamin PradereBenjamin Pradere , Morgan RoupretMorgan Roupret , Thomas SeisenThomas Seisen , Shahrokh F. ShariatShahrokh F. Shariat , Giuseppe SimoneGiuseppe Simone , Robert J. SteinRobert J. Stein , Long WangLong Wang , Jitao WuJitao Wu , Evanguelos XylinasEvanguelos Xylinas , Lin YaoLin Yao , Homayoun ZargarHomayoun Zargar , Riccardo AutorinoRiccardo Autorino , Giovanni E. CacciamaniGiovanni E. Cacciamani , and Hooman DjaladatHooman Djaladat View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008644.01945.6c.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the mainstay surgical treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Despite the increasing dispersion of robotic approaches to RNU (RRNU) in recent years, no specific training curriculum is currently available to assist trainees through the learning process. The objective of this study is to define a structured training curriculum for RRNU through assessment among a group of experts in this field. METHODS: A survey on RRNU training programs was prepared based on the available evidence. The RRNU procedure was divided into eleven steps. The online inquiry was distributed through survey questionnaire to 30 experts in the field of UTUC surgical management based on their academic interest, research focus, including peer-reviewed publications, and surgical expertise embracing training courses. The modified Delphi methodology was applied, considering agreement among responders as ≥80%. RESULTS: Two rounds of the Delphi process were conducted to achieve consensus on the statements. The response rate for the first and second rounds was 80% (24/30) and 91.7% (22/24), respectively. Based on the results of the first round, the panel categorized the critical steps of RRNU into five modules, considering the complexity of each step and the minimum number of steps required for trainees to progress to the next level. Table 1 presents the essential statements obtained from the two rounds, delineating a well-structured training curriculum for RRNU. The curriculum's structure is illustrated in Figure 1. All statements, except the minimum annual RRNU volume and evaluation of a trainee's index video for modules I to V, reached a consensus level among participants (≥ 80%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a well-defined training curriculum for RRNU, designed to support trainees in their learning journey. Next step includes implementation and evaluation of this curriculum in clinical training programs. Download PPT Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e654 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam More articles by this author Alireza Ghoreifi More articles by this author Zhenjie Wu More articles by this author Firas Abdollah More articles by this author Alessandro Antonelli More articles by this author Daniel D. Eun More articles by this author Shengjie Guo More articles by this author Andrew J. Hung More articles by this author Lulin Ma More articles by this author Vitaly Margulis More articles by this author Surena F. Matin More articles by this author Reza Mehrazin More articles by this author James Porter More articles by this author Aaron Potretzke More articles by this author Benjamin Pradere More articles by this author Morgan Roupret More articles by this author Thomas Seisen More articles by this author Shahrokh F. Shariat More articles by this author Giuseppe Simone More articles by this author Robert J. Stein More articles by this author Long Wang More articles by this author Jitao Wu More articles by this author Evanguelos Xylinas More articles by this author Lin Yao More articles by this author Homayoun Zargar More articles by this author Riccardo Autorino More articles by this author Giovanni E. Cacciamani More articles by this author Hooman Djaladat More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...