3D virtual models and augmented reality for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review
Marcello Della Corte,Alberto Quarà,Sabrina De Cillis,Gabriele Volpi,Daniele Amparore,Federico Piramide,Alberto Piana,Michele Sica,Michele Di Dio,Stefano Alba,Francesco Porpiglia,Enrico Checcucci,Cristian Fiori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-31
Abstract:Background and objective: The increasing popularity of three-dimensional (3D) virtual reconstructions of two-dimensional (2D) imaging in urology has led to significant technological advancements, resulting in the creation of highly accurate 3D virtual models (3DVMs) that faithfully replicate individual anatomical details. This technology enhances surgical reality, providing surgeons with hyper-accurate insights into instantaneous subjective surgical anatomy and improving preoperative surgical planning. In the uro-oncologic field, the utility of 3D virtual reconstruction has been demonstrated in nephron-sparing surgery, impacting surgical strategy and postoperative outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study is to offer a thorough narrative review of the current state and application of 3D reconstructions and augmented reality (AR) in radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: A non-systematic literature review was conducted using Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and Embase to gather information on clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, review articles, and prospective and retrospective studies related to 3DVMs and AR in RP. The search strategy followed the PICOS (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design) criteria and was performed in January 2024. Key content and findings: The adoption of 3D visualization has become widespread, with applications ranging from preoperative planning to intraoperative consultations. The urological community's interest in intraoperative surgical navigation using cognitive, virtual, mixed, and AR during RP is evident in a substantial body of literature, including 16 noteworthy investigations. These studies highlight the varied experiences and benefits of incorporating 3D reconstructions and AR into RP, showcasing improvements in preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and real-time decision-making. Conclusions: The integration of 3DVMs and AR technologies in urological oncology, particularly in the context of RP, has shown promising advancements. These technologies provide crucial support in preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and real-time decision-making, significantly improving the visualization of complex anatomical structures helping in the nerve sparing (NS) approach modulation and reducing positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. Despite positive outcomes, challenges such as small patient cohorts, lack of standardized methodologies, and concerns about costs and technology adoption persist.