Exposure limits to magnetic resonance imaging fields: invisible land mines or fields to mine.

W. Weightman,Neville M. Gibbs,M. Sheminant,Mark A. J. Newman,Dianne E. Grey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ce9d8b

IF: 8.986

2010-03-01

Anesthesiology

Abstract:an observation; diagnoses recorded on death certificates were never part of our original hypothesis and cannot be used in the inferential process. We do not agree with Gross et al. that it is scientifically valid to include a long-term outcome (death with a cancer-related diagnosis) in a predictive model based on the perioperative physical status of the patient. Dr. Roth’s suggestion that blood transfusion and extracorporeal circulation may have synergistic adverse effects is not unreasonable. Certainly, this is one explanation for the observation that cardiac surgery is the only clinical setting where adverse transfusion-related immunomodulation effects have been conclusively demonstrated. Our study data does not help to clarify this suggestion, however, as most of our transfused patients were exposed to extracorporeal circulation. None of this is any reason to promote the use of blood. The short-term risks are compelling, as are the huge costs and the ever diminishing resource. However, we should not be misinforming patients who have survived more than 2 months after coronary artery grafts that they have a serious risk of premature death as a result of a moderate transfusion of blood products.