On the thermal emissive behavior of four common alloys processed via Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
César A. Terrazas-Nájera,Alfonso Fernández,Ralph Felice,Ryan Wicker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104023
IF: 11
2024-02-07
Additive Manufacturing
Abstract:Current thermal monitoring methods used in metal powder bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) rely on a priori knowledge of the emissivity, which is usually assumed temperature, wavelength, and time invariant. Given the true dynamic nature of emissivity for a given material, these assumptions result in the calculation of inaccurate process temperatures, or in the reporting of radiant intensity or radiance temperature as a proxy for the absolute temperature. In this work, we detail the use of a multi-wavelength (MW) pyrometry technique, operating in the spectral range from approximately 900–1700nm, to capture radiant intensity emissions during processing of various materials using the electron-beam powder bed fusion (PBF-EB) process. The technique measured spectral intensity and analyzed the results of these data after processing with Planck's distribution law in its two-color or ratio pyrometry form to establish the spectral and temporal emissive behavior in the active range from 1080–1637nm. Four commonly used alloys (Ti6Al4V, TiAl, 316 L, and IN625) were examined here as each of these alloys underwent transitions (from powder to liquid to structured solid) induced during processing. For each material studied, analysis of the aggregated data for ten layers, superimposed in time, identified specific and repeatable trends in the emissivity, with plotted measurements forming clusters or regions in each of the processing stages (preheating, melt scanning, liquid, and cooldown). Also, the data recorded by the MW pyrometer was used to analyze the spectral variability of measurements as well as temporal changes in emissive behavior (from gray to non-gray) at similar temperatures and points in time in each processing stage but during different layers or scans. The results show that the measured emissive behaviors for the four materials were highly variable during processing, with typical differences during transitions ranging from 20% to 75%, and as high as 300% for the case of Ti6Al4V, indicating emissive behaviors that are highly dynamic rather than temporally and spectrally invariant. This dynamic emissive behavior is associated with changes in temperature, morphology, phase, and chemistry of the processed metal that happen during the highly transient and non-equilibrium conditions of PBF AM, and that can only be accounted for by performing in situ measurements during processing using techniques that do not rely on prior knowledge of the emissivity. These results are intended to (1) better inform the additive manufacturing community on the physical nature of emissivity of metallic materials during processing, and (2) provide foundational emissivity data that can be used to improve numerical modeling and the application of radiation thermometry techniques in PBF AM. Further, these results indicate that the emissive behavior during processing can result in significant variations temporally and spectrally, and although the results can be used as foundational emissive behavior measurements, the authors recommend the use of in situ techniques that operate without prior knowledge of emissivity to reduce uncertainties in measurements during PBF AM.
engineering, manufacturing,materials science, multidisciplinary