Abstract:Despite being of undisputed importance, there is no consensus on what emotions are, with the majority of research that constructs ideas about them being colored by a particular worldview. This conceptual article examines the case for conducting an Islamic analysis of emotion. It might seem a peculiar area to examine; what would be the need to analyze such a universal psychological concept through the lens of a particular religion? Three points are used to argue for this endeavor. To begin with, this article highlights the relative instability of the term; there is yet no universally agreed upon definition of what emotions are, and which human processes they contribute to. As the concept is still being defined, there is merit in engaging with the discussion, particularly given the relative absence of metaphysics from the debate. Secondly, specificities relating to emotions and how they have conceptualized are considered. This section delves into the way in which variable factors, such as culture, language, and worldview, influence how emotions manifest. The overarching point argued for here is that how emotions are experienced, and even which emotions are experienced, are shaped by factors that are not consistent across time and space. Accordingly, different worldviews will formulate different "emotional palates" and "emotional ideologies"; different groups of people will understand and engage with emotions differently. Thirdly, a broader discussion ensues pertaining to the nature of science, psychology, and their relationship with secularity. This discussion includes critique of the idea that forces such as secularism and scientific materialism have been "discovered" and are therefore value-neutral. Accordingly, understandings of emotions to have emerged from the Academy, and contemporary psychology, are value-laden. This section also looks at the origins of science in order to determine whether it is inherently atheistic or areligious, and therefore antagonistic to a religious worldview. The section also challenges the apparent secularity of psychology and key psychologists. A range of other facets pertaining to how the emotions have been conceptualized, such as their relational core, their interaction with moral faculties, and their enmeshment with what is important to individuals and groups, are also considered.

The Feeling "Without Any Name"

Emotion in a Century: A Review of Emotion Recognition

What are aesthetic emotions?

Feeling Something without Knowing Why: Measuring Emotions toward Archetypal Content.

A qualitative analysis of emotional effector patterns and their feedback

Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.

Emotion: the Self-regulatory Sense

Reason without feelings? Emotions in the history of western philosophy

The rise of affectivism

Emotion Theory and Research: Highlights, Unanswered Questions, and Emerging Issues

A concept in flux and starved of the metaphysical: desecularizing emotion

The Many Meanings/Aspects of Emotion: Definitions, Functions, Activation, and Regulation

The subjective experience of emotion: a fearful view

Concepts of Emotions in Modern Philosophy and Psychology

Emotional Expression: Advances in Basic Emotion Theory

Differentiation of Primary Emotions Through Neuromodulators: Review of Literature

Toward a Working Definition of Emotion

Where are the emotions in written words and phrases? Commentary on Hinojosa, Moreno and Ferré: affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion (2019)

Affect Theory and Literary Criticism

Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion

A review of the current state of emotion research in product development