Abstract:Abstract Background Mendelian randomization (MR) has been widely applied to causal inference in medical research. It uses genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to investigate putative causal relationship between an exposure and an outcome. Traditional MR methods have mainly focussed on a two-sample setting in which IV-exposure association study and IV-outcome association study are independent. However, it is not uncommon that participants from the two studies fully overlap (one-sample) or partly overlap (overlapping-sample). Methods We proposed a Bayesian method that is applicable to all the three sample settings. In essence, we converted a two- or overlapping- sample MR to a one-sample MR where data were partly unmeasured. Assume that all study individuals were drawn from the same population and unmeasured data were missing at random. Then the missing data were treated au pair with the model parameters as unknown quantities, and thus, were imputed iteratively conditioning on the observed data and estimated parameters using Markov chain Monte Carlo. We generalised our model to allow for pleiotropy and multiple exposures and assessed its performance by a number of simulations using four metrics: mean, standard deviation, coverage and power. We also compared our method with classic MR methods. Results In our proposed method, higher sample overlapping rate and instrument strength led to more precise estimated causal effects with higher power. Pleiotropy had a notably negative impact on the estimates. Nevertheless, the coverages were high and our model performed well in all the sample settings overall. In comparison with classic MR, our method provided estimates with higher precision. When the true causal effects were non-zero, power of their estimates was consistently higher from our method. The performance of our method was similar to classic MR in terms of coverage. Conclusions Our model offers the flexibility of being applicable to any of the sample settings. It is an important addition to the MR literature which has restricted to one- or two- sample scenarios. Given the nature of Bayesian inference, it can be easily extended to more complex MR analysis in medical research.

Bayesian Mendelian Randomization identifies disease causing proteins via pedigree data, partially observed exposures and correlated instruments

Inferring the Direction of a Causal Link and Estimating Its Effect via a Bayesian Mendelian Randomization Approach

Selecting likely causal risk factors from high-throughput experiments using multivariable Mendelian randomization

Genetic drug target validation using Mendelian randomisation

Likelihood-based Mendelian randomization analysis with automated instrument selection and horizontal pleiotropic modeling

Bayesian network-based Mendelian randomization for variant prioritization and phenotypic causal inference

MR-Corr2: a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Method That Accounts for Correlated Horizontal Pleiotropy Using Correlated Instrumental Variants

A new robust and accurate two-sample Mendelian randomization method with a large number of genetic variants

Mendelian randomization accounting for complex correlated horizontal pleiotropy while elucidating shared genetic etiology

Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies

Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy

A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy

Reciprocal causation mixture model for robust Mendelian randomization analysis using genome-scale summary data

An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting

MR-link-2: pleiotropy robust cis Mendelian randomization validated in four independent gold-standard datasets of causality

Bias from heritable confounding in Mendelian randomization studies

MR-link-2: pleiotropy robust Mendelian randomization validated in four independent gold-standard datasets of causality

Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics

Bayesian Mendelian Randomization Analysis for Latent Exposures Leveraging GWAS Summary Statistics for Traits Co-Regulated by the Exposures

Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach

Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology