Abstract:Background: : MR-Egger regression has recently been proposed as a method for Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses incorporating summary data estimates of causal effect from multiple individual variants, which is robust to invalid instruments. It can be used to test for directional pleiotropy and provides an estimate of the causal effect adjusted for its presence. MR-Egger regression provides a useful additional sensitivity analysis to the standard inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach that assumes all variants are valid instruments. Both methods use weights that consider the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-exposure associations to be known, rather than estimated. We call this the `NO Measurement Error' (NOME) assumption. Causal effect estimates from the IVW approach exhibit weak instrument bias whenever the genetic variants utilized violate the NOME assumption, which can be reliably measured using the F-statistic. The effect of NOME violation on MR-Egger regression has yet to be studied.Methods: An adaptation of the I2 statistic from the field of meta-analysis is proposed to quantify the strength of NOME violation for MR-Egger. It lies between 0 and 1, and indicates the expected relative bias (or dilution) of the MR-Egger causal estimate in the two-sample MR context. We call it IGX2 . The method of simulation extrapolation is also explored to counteract the dilution. Their joint utility is evaluated using simulated data and applied to a real MR example.Results: In simulated two-sample MR analyses we show that, when a causal effect exists, the MR-Egger estimate of causal effect is biased towards the null when NOME is violated, and the stronger the violation (as indicated by lower values of IGX2 ), the stronger the dilution. When additionally all genetic variants are valid instruments, the type I error rate of the MR-Egger test for pleiotropy is inflated and the causal effect underestimated. Simulation extrapolation is shown to substantially mitigate these adverse effects. We demonstrate our proposed approach for a two-sample summary data MR analysis to estimate the causal effect of low-density lipoprotein on heart disease risk. A high value of IGX2 close to 1 indicates that dilution does not materially affect the standard MR-Egger analyses for these data.Conclusions: : Care must be taken to assess the NOME assumption via the IGX2 statistic before implementing standard MR-Egger regression in the two-sample summary data context. If IGX2 is sufficiently low (less than 90%), inferences from the method should be interpreted with caution and adjustment methods considered.

Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption

Powerful genome-wide design and robust statistical inference in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization

An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings

Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic

Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator

Reciprocal causation mixture model for robust Mendelian randomization analysis using genome-scale summary data

Bayesian Weighted Mendelian Randomization for Causal Inference based on Summary Statistics

Robust instrumental variable methods using multiple candidate instruments with application to Mendelian randomization

A Random Effects Model-based Method of Moments Estimation of Causal Effect in Mendelian Randomization Studies

A robust two-sample Mendelian Randomization method integrating GWAS with multi-tissue eQTL summary statistics

Robust multivariable Mendelian randomization based on constrained maximum likelihood

A latent outcome variable approach for Mendelian randomization using the expectation maximization algorithm

Integrating summarized data from multiple genetic variants in Mendelian randomization: bias and coverage properties of inverse-variance weighted methods

Winner's Curse Free Robust Mendelian Randomization with Summary Data

An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting

A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy

A new robust and accurate two-sample Mendelian randomization method with a large number of genetic variants

A Modified Debiased Inverse‐Variance Weighted Estimator in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization

Likelihood-based Mendelian randomization analysis with automated instrument selection and horizontal pleiotropic modeling

Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics