Evaluating convolutional neural network-enhanced electrocardiography for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy detection in a specialized cardiovascular setting
Naomi Hirota,Shinya Suzuki,Jun Motogi,Takuya Umemoto,Hiroshi Nakai,Wataru Matsuzawa,Tsuneo Takayanagi,Akira Hyodo,Keiichi Satoh,Takuto Arita,Naoharu Yagi,Mikio Kishi,Hiroaki Semba,Hiroto Kano,Shunsuke Matsuno,Yuko Kato,Takayuki Otsuka,Tokuhisa Uejima,Yuji Oikawa,Takayuki Hori,Minoru Matsuhama,Mitsuru Iida,Junji Yajima,Takeshi Yamashita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02367-9
2024-04-01
Heart and Vessels
Abstract:The efficacy of convolutional neural network (CNN)-enhanced electrocardiography (ECG) in detecting hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated HCM (dHCM) remains uncertain in real-world applications. This retrospective study analyzed data from 19,170 patients (including 140 HCM or dHCM) in the Shinken Database (2010–2017). We evaluated the sensitivity, positive predictive rate (PPR), and F1 score of CNN-enhanced ECG in a ''basic diagnosis'' model (total disease label) and a ''comprehensive diagnosis'' model (including disease subtypes). Using all-lead ECG in the "basic diagnosis" model, we observed a sensitivity of 76%, PPR of 2.9%, and F1 score of 0.056. These metrics improved in cases with a diagnostic probability of ≥ 0.9 and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on ECG: 100% sensitivity, 8.6% PPR, and 0.158 F1 score. The ''comprehensive diagnosis'' model further enhanced these figures to 100%, 13.0%, and 0.230, respectively. Performance was broadly consistent across CNN models using different lead configurations, particularly when including leads viewing the lateral walls. While the precision of CNN models in detecting HCM or dHCM in real-world settings is initially low, it improves by targeting specific patient groups and integrating disease subtype models. The use of ECGs with fewer leads, especially those involving the lateral walls, appears comparably effective.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease