Usefulness of Machine Learning-Based Detection and Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias With 12-Lead Electrocardiograms

Kuan-Cheng Chang,Po-Hsin Hsieh,Mei-Yao Wu,Yu-Chen Wang,Jan-Yow Chen,Fuu-Jen Tsai,Edward S C Shih,Ming-Jing Hwang,Tzung-Chi Huang,Edward S.C. Shih
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.02.096
IF: 6.614
2021-01-01
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Deep-learning algorithms to annotate electrocardiograms (ECGs) and classify different types of cardiac arrhythmias by using a single-lead ECG input data set have been developed. It remains to be determined whether these algorithms can be generalized to 12-lead, ECG-based rhythm classification.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>We employed a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to detect 12 heart rhythm classes by using 65,932 digital 12-lead ECG signals from 38,899 patients, using annotations obtained by consensus of three board-certified electrophysiologists as the gold standard.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The accuracy of the LSTM model for the classification of each of the 12 heart rhythms was ≥0.982 (range: 0.982–1.0), with an area under the curve of ≥0.987 (range: 0.987–1.0). The precision and recall ranged from 0.692 to 1 and from 0.625 to 1, respectively, with an <em>F</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> score of ≥0.777 (range: 0.777–1.0). The accuracy of the model (0.90) was superior to the mean accuracies of internal-medicine specialists (0.55), emergency physicians (0.73), and cardiologists (0.83).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the deep-learning LSTM model for interpreting 12 common heart rhythms according to 12-lead ECG signals. The findings may have clinical relevance for the early diagnosis of cardiac-rhythm disorders.</p>
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?