Abstract:This work presents an open-source software pipeline to create patient-specific left atrial models with fibre orientations and a fibrosis map, suitable for electrophysiology simulations, and quantifies the intra and inter observer reproducibility of the model creation. The semi-automatic pipeline takes as input a contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram, and a late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) contrast magnetic resonance (CMR). Five operators were allocated 20 cases each from a set of 50 CMR datasets to create a total of 100 models to evaluate inter and intra-operator variability. Each output model consisted of: (1) a labelled surface mesh open at the pulmonary veins and mitral valve, (2) fibre orientations mapped from a diffusion tensor MRI (DTMRI) human atlas, (3) fibrosis map extracted from the LGE-CMR scan, and (4) simulation of local activation time (LAT) and phase singularity (PS) mapping. Reproducibility in our pipeline was evaluated by comparing agreement in shape of the output meshes, fibrosis distribution in the left atrial body, and fibre orientations. Reproducibility in simulations outputs was evaluated in the LAT maps by comparing the total activation times, and the mean conduction velocity (CV). PS maps were compared with the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). The users processed in total 60 cases for inter and 40 cases for intra-operator variability. Our workflow allows a single model to be created in 16.72 ± 12.25 min. Similarity was measured with shape, percentage of fibres oriented in the same direction, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the fibrosis calculation. Shape differed noticeably only with users' selection of the mitral valve and the length of the pulmonary veins from the ostia to the distal end; fibrosis agreement was high, with ICC of 0.909 (inter) and 0.999 (intra); fibre orientation agreement was high with 60.63% (inter) and 71.77% (intra). The LAT showed good agreement, where the median ± IQR of the absolute difference of the total activation times was 2.02 ± 2.45 ms for inter, and 1.37 ± 2.45 ms for intra. Also, the average ± sd of the mean CV difference was -0.00404 ± 0.0155 m/s for inter, and 0.0021 ± 0.0115 m/s for intra. Finally, the PS maps showed a moderately good agreement in SSIM for inter and intra, where the mean ± sd SSIM for inter and intra were 0.648 ± 0.21 and 0.608 ± 0.15, respectively. Although we found notable differences in the models, as a consequence of user input, our tests show that the uncertainty caused by both inter and intra-operator variability is comparable with uncertainty due to estimated fibres, and image resolution accuracy of segmentation tools.

Replication of the bSTAR sequence and open-source implementation

Rapid 3D Dynamic Arterial Spin Labeling with a Sparse Model-Based Image Reconstruction

HF-SENSE: an Improved Partially Parallel Imaging Using a High-Pass Filter

Submillimeter lung MRI at 0.55 T using balanced steady-state free precession with half-radial dual-echo readout (bSTAR)

Evaluation of an open-source pipeline to create patient-specific left atrial models: A reproducibility study

Free-breathing half-radial dual-echo balanced steady-state free precession thoracic imaging with wobbling Archimedean spiral pole trajectories

Single breath‐hold volumetric lung imaging at 0.55T using stack‐of‐spiral (SoS) out‐in balanced SSFP

Open-source Pulseq sequences on Philips MRI scanners

Repeatability of Open‐MOLLI: An open‐source inversion recovery myocardial T1 mapping sequence for fast prototyping

T1 and T2 measurements across multiple 0.55T MRI systems using open-source vendor-neutral sequences

Compartment-based reconstruction of acquisition-weighted 31P cardiac MRSI reduces sensitivity to cardiac motion and scan planning

Open-radiomics: A Collection of Standardized Datasets and a Technical Protocol for Reproducible Radiomics Machine Learning Pipelines

Sequence comparison of spoiled gradient echo and balanced steady‐state free precession for pulmonary free‐breathing proton MRI in patients and healthy volunteers: Correspondence, repeatability, and validation with dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI

Repeat it without me: Crowdsourcing the T1 mapping common ground via the ISMRM reproducibility challenge

Reduced cross‐scanner variability using vendor‐agnostic sequences for single‐shell diffusion MRI

Frequency-modulated SSFP with radial sampling and subspace reconstruction: A time-efficient alternative to phase-cycled bSSFP

Reproducibility of arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow image processing: A report of the ISMRM open science initiative for perfusion imaging (OSIPI)_and the ASL MRI challenge

Contrast-agent-based perfusion MRI code repository and testing framework: ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI)

Improved reproducibility for myocardial ASL: Impact of physiological and acquisition parameters

Feasibility of dynamic T2 *-based oxygen-enhanced lung MRI at 3T

Semi-automated reproducible target transfer for cardiac radioablation - A multi-center cross-validation study within the RAVENTA trial