Abstract:Maintaining biodiversity requires direct and indirect interspecific interactions. The study of direct interactions, including competition, predation, mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism, has greatly promoted the development of species coexistence theory'. However, as a simplified method to explain community assembly, direct interactions alone cannot adequately explain the coexistence of related species in the absence of indirect interactions. Indirect interactions can be defined as the impact of one species on another that is mediated or transmitted by a third, and they are considered to be a more complex and less understood type of interspecific interaction. During the past two decades, scientists have gradually realized that a type of density-mediated indirect interaction, known as intransitive competition, is ubiquitous in nature. Intransitive competition can be described as a game of "rockpaper-scissors" in which three species A, B and C have competitive ranks A>B>C>A. In this competitive mode, competitive exclusion between relative species is counteracted by mutual restrictiveness, and there are no "invincible" species in the community. Therefore, intransitive competition is an important factor in promoting species coexistence, which affects species distribution patterns, community structure and ecosystem functions. To summarize the theory' of intransitive competition, this paper discusses the definition, characteristics, and detection methods of intransitive competition and the main factors affecting intransitive competition as well. There are five formation modes of intransitive competition. Resource utilization mode occurs when species have different competitive abilities for resources. Life history mode arises if species cannot maintain an absolute competitive advantage throughout their life stages. Behavioral trade-off mode follows when species have different ways of acquiring resources. Competition trade-off mode and allelopathy mode require species to develop both aggressive and defensive survival strategies. Our paper also explores three characteristics of intransitive competition. First, the populations of species participating in intransitive competition often exhibit periodic fluctuations in their frequency. which are regulated by dynamic equilibrium. Second, intransitive competition systems involving an odd number of species can maintain community stability, whereas systems involving an even number of species will theoretically collapse. Finally, multiple intransitive competition loops may appear in the community, and intransitive competition may also be nested in other coexistence patterns. This nested feature makes intransitive competition difficult to detect and measure. Fortunately, current research methods such as competition matrix, transfer matrix and invasion growth rate model can be used to infer the existence of intransitive competition and quantify its prevalence and importance. Competitive rank has been considered as one of the most important factors affecting intransitive competition. The higher the coefficient of variation of competitive rank among species, the more negative impact on intransitive competition. At the same time, global-scale environmental changes could also be critical factors: drought increases the intransitive competition in the community, but eutrophication caused by land-use intensification reduces the intransitive competition. Functional traits are non-negligible because species traits adapted to high-productivity environments often impede the formation of intransitive competition. Finally, to promote the understanding of indirect interaction and multi-species coexistence strategies, we propose that future research on intransitive competition should focus on long-term controlled field experiments, coupled with theoretical considerations of high-order interactions, complex networks, and ecosystem function.

The unimodal intransitivity-fertility relationship is not mediated by demographic trade-offs in a subtropical forest

Spatial Associations of Tree Species in A Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest

Functional traits and environmental characteristics drive the degree of competitive intransitivity in European saltmarsh plant communities

Inferring competitive outcomes, ranks and intransitivity from empirical data: a comparison of different methods

The Role of Intransitive Competition in Species Coexistence

Consistency of demographic trade‐offs across 13 (sub)tropical forests

Habitat loss alters effects of intransitive higher-order competition on biodiversity: a new metapopulation framework

Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences

Intransitivity as a dynamic assembly engine of competitive communities

The interspecific growth–mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure

Competitive Intransitivity Promotes Species Coexistence

The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence

Rodent Abundance Triggered Switch Between the Relative Mutualism and Predation in a Rodent-Seed System of the Subtropical Island Forest.

Quantifying Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Other Clustering Processes on Spatial Distributions of Tree Species

Intransitivity increases plant functional diversity by limiting dominance in drylands worldwide

Partitioning Beta Diversity in A Subtropical Broad-Leaved Forest of China

How Do Functional Traits Influence Tree Demographic Properties in a Subtropical Monsoon Forest?

Functional Diversity Versus Species Diversity: Relationships with Habitat Heterogeneity at Multiple Scales in A Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest

Transitivity and intransitivity in soil bacterial networks

Sexual Competition and N Supply Interactively Affect the Dimorphism and Competiveness of Opposite Sexes in Populus Cathayana.

An experimental extreme drought reduces the likelihood of species to coexist despite increasing intransitivity in competitive networks