[Experimental studies on relevant stability values for pressure osteosyntheses of tubular bones and their changes in old age].

A. Grünert,G. Ritter

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Can marathon running improve knee damage of middle-aged adults? A prospective cohort study

Laura Maria Horga,Johann Henckel,Anastasia Fotiadou,Anna Hirschmann,Camilla Torlasco,Anna Di Laura,Andrew D'Silva,Sanjay Sharma,James Moon,Alister Hart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000586

2019-10-01

Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the short-term impact of long-distance running on knee joints using MRI. Methods 82 healthy adults participating in their first marathon underwent 3T (Tesla) MRI of both knees 6 months before and half a month after the marathon: 71 completed both the 4 month-long standardised training programme and the marathon; and 11 dropped-out during training and did not run the marathon. Two senior musculoskeletal radiologists graded the internal knee structures using validated scoring systems. Participants completed Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaires at each visit for self-reporting knee function. Results Premarathon and pretraining MRI showed signs of damage, without symptoms, to several knee structures in the majority of the 82 middle-aged volunteers. However, after the marathon, MRI showed a reduction in the radiological score of damage in: subchondral bone marrow oedema in the condyles of the tibia (p=0.011) and femur (p=0.082). MRI did also show an increase in radiological scores to the following structures: cartilage of the lateral patella (p=0.0005); semimembranosus tendon (p=0.016); iliotibial band (p<0.0001) and the prepatellar bursa (p=0.016). Conclusion Improvement to damaged subchondral bone of the tibial and femoral condyles was found following the marathon in novice runners, as well as worsening of the patella cartilage although asymptomatic. This is the most robust evidence to link marathon running with knee joint health and provides important information for those seeking to understand the link between long distance running and osteoarthritis of the main weight-bearing areas of the knee.
Should Adolescents Run Marathons?: Youth Marathon Training Injury Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Joshua T. Goldman,Emily Miller,Summer Runestad,Rebecka Serpa,Jennifer Beck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0000000000000870

2020-09-15

Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Abstract:Youth participation in distance running has increased, yet little data exist about the injury patterns and safety of such activity. This study seeks to determine the types and rates of injuries seen in an adolescent marathon training program.

physiology,orthopedics,sport sciences
Running and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kate A. Timmins,Richard D. Leech,Mark E. Batt,Kimberley L. Edwards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516657531

IF: 4.8

2016-08-20

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition characterized by pain, impaired function, and reduced quality of life. A number of risk factors for knee OA have been identified, such as obesity, occupation, and injury. The association between knee OA and physical activity or particular sports such as running is less clear. Previous reviews, and the evidence that informs them, present contradictory or inconclusive findings. Purpose: This systematic review aimed to determine the association between running and the development of knee OA. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched, along with citations in eligible articles and reviews and the contents of recent journal issues. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts using prespecified eligibility criteria. Full-text articles were also independently assessed for eligibility. Eligible studies were those in which running or running-related sports (eg, triathlon or orienteering) were assessed as a risk factor for the onset or progression of knee OA in adults. Relevant outcomes included (1) diagnosis of knee OA, (2) radiographic markers of knee OA, (3) knee joint surgery for OA, (4) knee pain, and (5) knee-associated disability. Risk of bias was judged by use of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with case-control studies investigating arthroplasty. Results: After de-duplication, the search returned 1322 records. Of these, 153 full-text articles were assessed; 25 were eligible, describing 15 studies: 11 cohort (6 retrospective) and 4 case-control studies. Findings of studies with a diagnostic OA outcome were mixed. Some radiographic differences were observed in runners, but only at baseline within some subgroups. Meta-analysis suggested a protective effect of running against surgery due to OA: pooled odds ratio 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30-0.71). The I 2 was 0% (95% CI, 0%-73%). Evidence relating to symptomatic outcomes was sparse and inconclusive. Conclusion: With this evidence, it is not possible to determine the role of running in knee OA. Moderate- to low-quality evidence suggests no association with OA diagnosis, a positive association with OA diagnosis, and a negative association with knee OA surgery. Conflicting results may reflect methodological heterogeneity. More evidence from well-designed, prospective studies is needed to clarify the contradictions.
Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis in Runners Corresponding

P. Foye

Abstract:Introduction: I t has been est imated that approximately 30 to 37 million Americans run for exercise. There is concern that this form of exercise may increase the risk for development of osteoarthritis in weight-bearing joints. It is felt that the constant loading of lower extremity joints that occurs during running could damage cartilage and underlying bone and predispose to osteoarthritis. As the number of runners, as well as number of Americans with osteoarthritis continues to grow, it is important to establish if there is a link between running and future development of osteoarthritis. Method: A literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE using the following keywords: knee, osteoarthritis, runners, running. Articles were reviewed and selected based on their relevance to this topic. Results: Of the articles reviewed, one did show a positive relationship overall between running and development of radiological evidence of osteoarthritis. Another found a positive relationship in men under age 50, and postulated that this was due to higher running pace. Female runners may have an increased risk of osteophyte development (though presence of osteophytes alone does not meet the criteria for diagnosis of osteoarthritis). Most studies, however, concluded that running did not cause osteoarthritis. Conclusion: There may be an increased risk for developing osteoarthritis for those who run at faster paces. For those who run at moderate paces, the risk does not appear to be increased. Studies have shown that runners have less physical disability in both lower and upper extremity functions. In addition, running has emotional benefits (stress relief, runner’s high), cardiovascular benefits, increases bone density, and increases pain threshold. In the absence of joint abnormalities or underlying injuries, at moderate paces, running appears to be safe and even highly beneficial.

Medicine
Effects of Running on the Development of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review at Short-Term Follow-up

Jaydeep Dhillon,Matthew J. Kraeutler,John W. Belk,Anthony J. Scillia,Eric C. McCarty,Jeremy K. Ansah-Twum,Patrick C. McCulloch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231152900

IF: 2.6

2023-03-03

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 3, March 2023. Background:Some studies have suggested that running increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA), while others believe it serves a protective function.Purpose:To perform an updated systematic review of the literature to determine the effects of running on the development of knee OA.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to identify studies evaluating the effect of cumulative running on the development of knee OA or chondral damage based on imaging and/or patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The search terms used were "knee AND osteoarthritis AND (run OR running OR runner)." Patients were evaluated based on plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PROs (presence of knee pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score).Results:Seventeen studies (6 level 2 studies, 9 level 3 studies, and 2 level 4 studies), with 7194 runners and 6947 nonrunners, met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 55.8 months in the runner group and 99.7 months in the nonrunner group. The mean age was 56.2 years in the runner group and 61.6 years in the nonrunner group. The overall percentage of men was 58.5%. There was a significantly higher prevalence of knee pain in the nonrunner group (P .05). One study found a significantly higher risk of knee OA progressing to total knee replacement among nonrunners (4.6% vs 2.6%; P = .014).Conclusion:In the short term, running is not associated with worsening PROs or radiological signs of knee OA and may be protective against generalized knee pain.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Sex Chromatin in Newborns: Presumptive Evidence for External Factors in Human Nondisjunction

A. Robinson,T. Puck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3666.83

IF: 56.9

1965-04-02

Science

Abstract:An incidence of 0.6 percent of sex-chromosome aberrations in newborns was found during a 5-month period, while no aberrations occurred in similar populations before and after this period. Down's syndrome also exhibited an elevated frequency during this same critical interval. A severe rubella epidemic may have influenced this pattern.
Biomechanical changes identified during a marathon race among high-school aged runners

Alexandra F DeJong Lempke,Danielle L Hunt,Sarah B Willwerth,Pierre A d'Hemecourt,William P Meehan,Kristin E Whitney,Alexandra F. DeJong Lempke,Danielle L. Hunt,Sarah B. Willwerth,Pierre A. d’Hemecourt,William P. Meehan,Kristin E. Whitney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.11.009

IF: 2.746

2024-02-01

Gait & Posture

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing popularity of endurance running competitions among adolescent runners, there is currently limited information regarding expected biomechanical changes across the duration of a long-distance running event, and the relationship between young runners' biomechanics and running performance. Wearable technology offers an ecological means to continuously assess runners' biomechanical data during outdoor running competitions.RESEARCH QUESTION: Do adolescent athletes adopt changes in sensor-derived biomechanics throughout a marathon race, and are there relationships between race performance and biomechanical features among young marathoners?METHODS: Fourteen high-school aged runners (9 M, 5 F; age: 16 ± 1 years, height: 170.8 ± 7.5 cm; mass: 63.6 ± 9.4 kg) wore lace-mounted sensors to record step-by-step biomechanics during a marathon race. Official race segment completion times were extracted across 5 race segments (5-K, 15-K, Half Marathon [21.1-K], 35-K, Marathon [42.2-K]). Within-participant repeated measures of covariance (pace) were conducted to assess changes in biomechanics across the race, with Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons. Pearson's r correlations were performed to assess the relationship between race finish times and biomechanics.RESULTS: Pace was significantly slower (p-range: 0.002-0.005), contact times significantly longer, and stride lengths significantly shorter in the final segment compared to middle segments (p-range: 0.003-0.004). The rate of shock accumulation was significantly higher in the final race segment compared to the first three segments (p-range: 0.001-0.002). Moderate relationships existed between finish times and pace (r = -0.63), stride length (r = -0.62), and contact time (r = 0.51).SIGNIFICANCE: Adolescent runners altered their gait patterns in the final marathon segment compared to earlier segments. Spatiotemporal measures were moderately correlated with race finish times, suggesting a link between faster run pace, increased stride lengths, and reduced contact time for improved running performance during an endurance race.

neurosciences,orthopedics,sport sciences
Does Running Cause Osteoarthritis in the Hip or Knee?

Pamela Hansen,Michael English,Stuart E. Willick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.02.011

2012-05-01

PM and R

Abstract:Running is an excellent activity to promote general health and well-being. However, running injuries are common, and concern is sometimes raised that running might lead to osteoarthritis in weight-bearing joints. This article reviews the relevant in vitro and in vivo literature that looks at possible associations between running and the development of osteoarthritis. Also reviewed is the limited literature on running barefoot and with minimalist footwear. Low- and moderate-volume runners appear to have no more risk of developing osteoarthritis than nonrunners. The existing literature is inconclusive about a possible association between high-volume running and the development of osteoarthritis. The early literature on running barefoot and running with minimalist footwear has primarily focused on biomechanics but has not yet focused on any effect on cartilage health. Experienced and beginner runners should be encouraged to allow the body adequate time to adapt to changes in gait biomechanics caused by changing footwear, which can be done by slowly increasing running mileage in the new footwear. Clinicians can improve the health of runners by encouraging appropriate treatment of musculoskeletal injuries, encouraging maintenance of an optimal body mass index, and correcting gait abnormalities caused by deficits in flexibility, strength, or motor control along the kinetic chain.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
Is the immediate effect of marathon running on novice runners’ knee joints sustained within 6 months after the run? A follow-up 3.0 T MRI study

Laura Maria Horga,Johann Henckel,Anastasia Fotiadou,Anna C. Hirschmann,Anna Di Laura,Camilla Torlasco,Andrew D’Silva,Sanjay Sharma,James C. Moon,Alister J. Hart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03391-2

2020-02-17

Skeletal Radiology

Abstract:Abstract Objective To evaluate changes in the knee joints of asymptomatic first-time marathon runners, using 3.0 T MRI, 6 months after finishing marathon training and run. Materials and methods Six months after their participation in a baseline study regarding their knee joints, 44 asymptomatic novice marathoners (17 males, 27 females, mean age 46 years old) agreed to participate in a repeat MRI investigation: 37 completed both a standardized 4-month-long training programme and the marathon (marathon runners); and 7 dropped out during training (pre-race dropouts). The participants already underwent bilateral 3.0 T MRIs: 6 months before and 2 weeks after their first marathon, the London Marathon 2017. This study was a follow-up assessment of their knee joints. Each knee structure was assessed using validated scoring/grading systems at all time points. Results Two weeks after the marathon, 3 pre-marathon bone marrow lesions and 2 cartilage lesions showed decrease in radiological score on MRI, and the improvement was sustained at the 6-month follow-up. New improvements were observed on MRI at follow-up: 5 pre-existing bone marrow lesions and 3 cartilage lesions that remained unchanged immediately after the marathon reduced in their extent 6 months later. No further lesions appeared at follow-up, and the 2-week post-marathon lesions showed signs of reversibility: 10 of 18 bone marrow oedema-like signals and 3 of 21 cartilage lesions decreased on MRI. Conclusion The knees of novice runners achieved sustained improvement, for at least 6 months post-marathon, in the condition of their bone marrow and articular cartilage.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,orthopedics
Risk factors for lower extremity injuries among male marathon runners

M. Van Middelkoop,J. Kolkman,J. Van Ochten,S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra,B. W. Koes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00768.x

2008-02-06

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Abstract:The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for lower extremity injuries in male marathon runners. A random sample of 1500 recreational male marathon runners was drawn. Possible risk factors were obtained from a baseline questionnaire 1 month before the start of the marathon. Information on injuries sustained shortly before or during the marathon was obtained using a post-race questionnaire. Of the 694 male runners who responded to the baseline and post-race questionnaire, 28% suffered a self-reported running injury on the lower extremities in the month before or during the marathon run. More than six times race participation in the previous 12 months [odds ratio (OR) 1.66; confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.56], a history of running injuries (OR 2.62; CI 1.82-3.78), high education level (OR 0.73; CI 0.51-1.04) and daily smoking (OR 0.23; CI 0.05-1.01) were associated with the occurrence of lower extremity injuries. Among the modifiable risk factor studies, a training distance <40 km a week is a strong protective factor of future calf injuries, and regular interval training is a strong protective factor for knee injuries. Other training characteristics appear to have little or no effect on future injuries.

sport sciences
Epidemiology and Aetiology of Marathon Running Injuries

Michael Fredericson,Anuruddh K. Misra,Anuruddh K Misra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737040-00043

IF: 11.928

2007-01-01

Sports Medicine

Abstract:Over the last 10–15 years, there has been a dramatic increase in popularity of running marathons. Numerous articles have reported on injuries to runners of all experience, with yearly incidence rates for injury reported to be as high as 90% in those training for marathons. To date, most of these studies have been cohort studies and retrospective surveys with remarkably few prospective studies. However, from the studies available, it is clear that more experienced runners are less prone to injury, with the number of years running being inversely related to incidence of injuries. For all runners, it is important to be fully recovered from any and all injury or illness prior to running a marathon. For those with less experience, a graduated training programme seems to clearly help prevent injuries with special attention to avoid any sudden increases in running load or intensity, with a particularly high risk for injury once a threshold of 40 miles/week is crossed. In both sexes, the most common injury by far was to the knee, typically on the anterior aspect (e.g. patellofemoral syndrome). Iliotibial band friction syndrome, tibial stress syndrome, plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendonitis and meniscal injuries of the knee were also commonly cited.

sport sciences
Endoscope modifications for laser prostatectomy.

S. M. Press,A. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/END.1995.9.101

1995-04-01

Journal of Endourology

Abstract:Prior to the development of the technique of laser prostatectomy, contemporary modifications to resectoscope design for transurethral prostatectomy had been scant. With the introduction of laser prostatectomy and the characterization of the "mini-TURP" technique, a new demand for improved continuous-flow cystoscopes and resectoscopes has developed. The ideal cystoscope design for laser prostatectomy would require the following: (1) continuous irrigant flow for optimum cooling of the laser element; (2) a large inflow port so that flow is not impaired by the presence of the fiber in the working channel; (3) a large outflow port to maximize irrigant flow; and (4) a fiber stabilizer to enable easy manipulation of the fiber in the center of the viewing field. The ideal resectoscope design for laser prostatectomy would require the following: (1) continuous flow of irrigant for cooling of the laser fiber; (2) stabilization of the laser fiber in the center of the field of view; (3) the ability to interchange electrocautery loops with laser fibers without changing the sheath; and (4) the ability to apply laser energy to tissue with the same Iglesias action used in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). This review analyzes the features of the new continuous-flow cystoscopes and resectoscopes manufactured specifically for use in laser prostatectomy. All manufacturers were requested to submit their most up-to-date literature and photographs of the specific instruments they manufacture. The technical specifications, advantages, and disadvantages of each instrument are discussed.
Accumulation and detoxification dynamics of microcystin-LR and antioxidant responses in male red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii.

Julin Yuan,Z. Gu,Yao Zheng,Yingying Zhang,Jiancao Gao,Shu Chen,Zaizhao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.05.004

IF: 5.202

2016-08-01

Aquatic Toxicology

Abstract:
Biochemical Response to a Moderate Running Bout in Participants With or Without a History of Acute Knee Injury

Nicole M. Cattano,Jeffrey B. Driban,Mary F. Barbe,Ryan T. Tierney,Mamta Amin,Michael R. Sitler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-51.5.09

2017-06-01

Journal of Athletic Training

Abstract:Context: Individuals with an acute knee-injury history are 4 times more likely to develop knee osteoarthritis than those without a prior knee injury, and it is unknown why. Individuals with an injury history may exhibit aberrant changes in tissue turnover after physical activity (eg, running), which could lead to osteoarthritis, but this has yet to be determined among young, physically active individuals. Objective: To determine collagen degradation and synthesis and inflammatory biomarker concentration levels before exercise and changes in response to an acute running bout in injured participants compared with healthy control participants. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 22 physically active individuals between 18 and 25 years of age were recruited for the study: 11 injured participants (knee injury within 4 years of the study) who were medically cleared for physical activity and 11 matched healthy control participants. Main Outcome Measure(s): The independent variable was group (injured or control). Dependent variables were serum biomarker concentrations for cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, matrix metalloproteinase-13, proinflammatory marker interleukin-1β, c-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type II collagen, and type II collagen synthesis marker. Each participant provided prerun and postrun blood samples for biomarker-concentration analysis. Results: No group differences existed in serum biomarker concentrations before exercise or in serum biomarker changes from pre-exercise to postexercise. Conclusions: After an acute bout of moderate-intensity running, young, active individuals in a high-risk postinjury population had similar biochemical responses as matched healthy controls. However, the external generalizability of these findings to other exercises and populations has yet to be determined.

sport sciences
MRI analysis of and factors related to knee injuries in amateur marathon runners

Yiying Shen,Wanzhen Yao,Yi Huang,Lingxiao Ye,Jie Liu,Mengxiao Liu,Jianping Ding,Yanjing Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306257

IF: 3.7

2024-07-09

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: Marathons are the most challenging form of running, and amateur athletes may be more prone to injury due to a lack of professional knowledge and instruction in running. Purpose: To analyze the MRI manifestations of and factors related to knee injuries in amateur marathon runners. Subjects: Data were collected from a hospital database of 105 qualified amateur marathon athletes (65 males,40 females), between May 2018 and December 2021. Field strength/sequence: 1.5T MR: sagittal fs-PDWI, sagittal T1WI and sagittal 3D-DESS sequence. Assessment: The MRI manifestations of knee joint injury were analyzed and evaluated by two radiologists. Statistical tests: The inter-observer agreement on MRI readings was analyzed using the kappa coefficient, and binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with knee injuries. Results: The overall prevalence of knee cartilage lesions, meniscus lesions and bone marrow edema among amateur marathon runners was 45.7%, 72.4%, and 49.5% respectively. Our analysis revealed that older age (OR = 1.135, P<0.001), higher BMI (OR = 1.236, P = 0.044), and slower pace (OR = 2.305, P = 0.017) were associated with increased risk of articular cartilage disease. Furthermore, older age (OR = 1.425, P<0.001) was identified as a risk factor for meniscal lesions, while older age (OR = 1.088, P = 0.002) was bone marrow edema. Notably, no significant correlation was observed between knee joint injuries of amateur marathon athletes and gender or the monthly running distance (P>0.05). Conclusions: The occurrence of knee injuries among amateur marathon athletes was highly prevalent, with the patellofemoral joint cartilage and posterior horn of medial meniscus being frequently affected areas. Moreover, age, BMI, running years and pace were significant risk factors of knee joint injury.
Change in Susceptibility Values in Knee Cartilage after Marathon Running Measured Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Ming Zhang,Yufei Li,Ruimin Feng,Zhongzheng Wang,Wenjin Wang,Nan Zheng,Shaobai Wang,Fuhua Yan,Yong Lu,Tsung-Yuan Tsai,Hongjiang Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27745

IF: 4.4

2021-01-01

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract:BackgroundQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been used to study the magnetic susceptibility properties of collagen fibers in articular cartilage; however, it is unclear whether QSM is sensitive to changes due to degradation caused by long‐distance running. It is clinically important to understand the link between long‐distance running and microstructural changes in knee cartilage.PurposeTo investigate the ability of QSM to assess microstructural changes within cartilage after repetitive loading.Study TypeProspective.PopulationThirteen recreational, male long‐distance runners.Field Strength/SequenceThree‐dimensional gradient recalled echo acquired at 3 T.AssessmentMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3D kinematics (translations and rotations during treadmill walking and running) of the knee joint were collected before and after marathon running. The compartments for analysis included the patella, trochlea, and subregions of femoral and tibial cartilage. Changes in regional susceptibility and cartilage thickness were calculated after marathon running. A susceptibility profile was obtained by fitting susceptibility as a function of the normalized depth of cartilage from the superficial to deep layers.Statistical TestsPaired t‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, 95% confidence interval (CI) of the depth‐wise susceptibility profile, Pearson correlation or Spearman correlation.ResultsThere was a statistically significant increase in susceptibility value in the weight‐bearing region of central medial femoral cartilage (cMF‐c) after marathon running (pre‐marathon: −0.0219 ± 0.0151 ppm, post‐marathon: −0.0070 ± 0.0213 ppm, P < 0.05), while the cartilage thickness did not show significant changes in any regions (P‐value range: 0.068–0.963). Significant susceptibility elevations occurred in the middle and deep layers of cMF‐c (95% CIs did not overlap). A trend toward a positive correlation was found between the changes in susceptibility value in cMF‐c and proximal–distal translation of the knee joint during walking (r = 0.55, P = 0.101) and running (r = 0.57, P = 0.089).Data ConclusionLocalized magnetic susceptibility alterations were observed within knee cartilage in the weight‐bearing area after repetitive loading without any morphologic changes.Level of Evidence2Technical EfficacyStage 2
Injury patterns and healthcare utilisation by runners of the New York City Marathon

Todd Michael McGrath,Mark Alan Fontana,Brett Gregory Toresdahl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001766

2024-03-01

BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine

Abstract:Objectives The purpose of this study was to describe injury patterns and healthcare utilisation of marathon runners. Methods This was a previously reported 16-week prospective observational study of runners training for the New York City Marathon. Runners completed a baseline survey including demographics, running experience and marathon goal. Injury surveys were collected every 4 weeks during training, as well as 1 week before and 1 week after the race. Injury details collected included anatomic location, diagnosis, onset, and treatment received. Results A total of 1049 runners were enrolled. Injuries were reported by 398 (38.4%) during training and 128 (14.1%) during the marathon. The overall prevalence of injury was 447/1049 (42.6%). Foot, knee and hip injuries were most common during training, whereas knee, thigh and foot injuries were most common during the race. The most frequent tissue type affected was the category of muscle, tendon/fascia and bursa. The prevalence of overuse injuries increased, while acute injuries remained constant throughout training. Hamstring injuries had the highest prevalence of diagnosis with 38/564 injuries (6.7%). Of the 447 runners who reported an injury, 224 (50.1%) received medical care. Physical therapy was the most common medical care received with 115/1037 (11.1%) runners during training and 44/907 (4.9%) postrace. Conclusion Runners training and participating in a marathon commonly experience injuries, especially of the foot and knee, which often are overuse soft tissue injuries. Half of the injured runners sought out medical care for their injury. Understanding the patterns of injuries affecting marathon runners could help guide future injury prevention efforts.
Regular Running Is Related to the Knee Joint Cartilage Structure in Healthy Adults

Daniel Jandacka,Victor Casula,Joseph Hamill,Dominik Vilímek,Vera Kristýna Jandackova,Steriani Elavsky,Jaroslav Uchytil,Jan Plesek,Jiří Skýpala,Milos Golian,Michal Burda,Miika T Nieminen,Miika T. Nieminen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003386

2024-01-18

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract:ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether regular running distance and biomechanics are related to medial central femur cartilage (MCFC) structure. Methods The cross-sectional study sample consisted of 1164 runners and non-runners aged 18-65 years. Participants completed questionnaires on physical activity and their running history. We performed quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage - T2 relaxation time (T2) mapping (high T2 indicate cartilage degeneration), and a running biomechanical analysis using a 3-D motion capture system. A 14-day monitoring of the physical activity was conducted. Results Those aged 35-49 years were at a 84% higher odds of having MCFC T2 in the highest level (85th percentile, P < 0.05) compared to youngest adults indicating that MCFC structures may be altered with ageing. Being male was associated with a 34% lower odds of having T2 at the highest level ( P < 0.05) compared to females. Non-runners and runners with the highest weekly running distance were more likely to have a high T2 compared to runners with running distance of 6-20 km per week ( P < 0.05). In addition, the maximal knee internal adduction moment was associated with a 19% lower odds of having T2 at the highest level ( P < 0.05). Conclusions Female compared to males and a middle-aged cohort compared to the younger cohort appeared to be associated with the degeneration of MCFC structures. Runners who ran 6-20 km/week were associated with a higher quality of their MCFC compared to highly active individuals and non-runners. Knee frontal plane biomechanics was related to MCFC structure indicating a possibility of modifying the medial knee collagen fibril network through regular running.

sport sciences
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Profile of Experienced Male Amateur Marathon Runners: A Systematic Review

Catherine O'Riordan,Eileen Savage,Micheál Newell,Gerard Flaherty,Irene Hartigan MSc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231176534

Sports Health

Abstract:Context: Male amateur marathon runners represent a unique subset of the population who may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to their underlying risk factors and their involvement in vigorous exercise such as marathon running. Objective: To assess the modifiable risk factors (MRFs) of CVD in experienced male amateur marathon runners and health interventions on CVD risk factors. Data sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and SPORTDiscus. Study selection: Studies selected according to the inclusion criteria. Study design: Systematic review. Level of evidence: Level 3. Data extraction: The publication dates included were from June 1, 2008 to February 29, 2020.Published primary epidemiological, observational, randomized controlled trial (RCT) and/or non-RCT studies assessing the MRFs of CVD and health interventions on CVD risk factors in male amateur marathon runners aged ≥18 years and written in the English language were included in the review. Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis. These included male amateur marathon runners (n = 862), aged 42 to 77 years. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and alcohol use were MRFs positively associated with an increased risk of coronary atherosclerosis found in a subset of male marathon runners. No studies examined health interventions on CVD risk factors in any of the included studies. All 5 studies were of good quality from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tools used. The risk of bias was low to moderate. Conclusion: There is a paucity of observational studies evaluating the CVD MRFs. Negative lifestyle behaviors exist within this population despite their engagement in physical exercise through marathon running. Marathon running does not negate the long-term effects caused by past negative lifestyle behaviors. This systematic review identifies that this population may not be aware of their possible risk of atherosclerosis and, consequently, CVD.

[Experimental studies on relevant stability values for pressure osteosyntheses of tubular bones and their changes in old age].

Can marathon running improve knee damage of middle-aged adults? A prospective cohort study

Should Adolescents Run Marathons?: Youth Marathon Training Injury Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Running and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis in Runners Corresponding

Effects of Running on the Development of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review at Short-Term Follow-up

Sex Chromatin in Newborns: Presumptive Evidence for External Factors in Human Nondisjunction

Biomechanical changes identified during a marathon race among high-school aged runners

Does Running Cause Osteoarthritis in the Hip or Knee?

Is the immediate effect of marathon running on novice runners’ knee joints sustained within 6 months after the run? A follow-up 3.0 T MRI study

Risk factors for lower extremity injuries among male marathon runners

Epidemiology and Aetiology of Marathon Running Injuries

Endoscope modifications for laser prostatectomy.

Accumulation and detoxification dynamics of microcystin-LR and antioxidant responses in male red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii.

Biochemical Response to a Moderate Running Bout in Participants With or Without a History of Acute Knee Injury

MRI analysis of and factors related to knee injuries in amateur marathon runners

Change in Susceptibility Values in Knee Cartilage after Marathon Running Measured Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Injury patterns and healthcare utilisation by runners of the New York City Marathon

Regular Running Is Related to the Knee Joint Cartilage Structure in Healthy Adults

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Profile of Experienced Male Amateur Marathon Runners: A Systematic Review