Change in Susceptibility Values in Knee Cartilage after Marathon Running Measured Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Ming Zhang,Yufei Li,Ruimin Feng,Zhongzheng Wang,Wenjin Wang,Nan Zheng,Shaobai Wang,Fuhua Yan,Yong Lu,Tsung-Yuan Tsai,Hongjiang Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27745
IF: 4.4
2021-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:BackgroundQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been used to study the magnetic susceptibility properties of collagen fibers in articular cartilage; however, it is unclear whether QSM is sensitive to changes due to degradation caused by long‐distance running. It is clinically important to understand the link between long‐distance running and microstructural changes in knee cartilage.PurposeTo investigate the ability of QSM to assess microstructural changes within cartilage after repetitive loading.Study TypeProspective.PopulationThirteen recreational, male long‐distance runners.Field Strength/SequenceThree‐dimensional gradient recalled echo acquired at 3 T.AssessmentMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3D kinematics (translations and rotations during treadmill walking and running) of the knee joint were collected before and after marathon running. The compartments for analysis included the patella, trochlea, and subregions of femoral and tibial cartilage. Changes in regional susceptibility and cartilage thickness were calculated after marathon running. A susceptibility profile was obtained by fitting susceptibility as a function of the normalized depth of cartilage from the superficial to deep layers.Statistical TestsPaired t‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, 95% confidence interval (CI) of the depth‐wise susceptibility profile, Pearson correlation or Spearman correlation.ResultsThere was a statistically significant increase in susceptibility value in the weight‐bearing region of central medial femoral cartilage (cMF‐c) after marathon running (pre‐marathon: −0.0219 ± 0.0151 ppm, post‐marathon: −0.0070 ± 0.0213 ppm, P < 0.05), while the cartilage thickness did not show significant changes in any regions (P‐value range: 0.068–0.963). Significant susceptibility elevations occurred in the middle and deep layers of cMF‐c (95% CIs did not overlap). A trend toward a positive correlation was found between the changes in susceptibility value in cMF‐c and proximal–distal translation of the knee joint during walking (r = 0.55, P = 0.101) and running (r = 0.57, P = 0.089).Data ConclusionLocalized magnetic susceptibility alterations were observed within knee cartilage in the weight‐bearing area after repetitive loading without any morphologic changes.Level of Evidence2Technical EfficacyStage 2
What problem does this paper attempt to address?