Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Health Inequities Training in Neurologic Disorders and Stroke: Analysis and Recommendations From the NINDS Advisory Council Working Group

David L Brody,Rebecca F Gottesman,Gerald Griffin,Zayd M Khaliq,Daniel T Lackland,Geoff Ling,Nimish Mohile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207567
IF: 9.9
2023-08-15
Neurology
Abstract:Background and objectives: In 2020, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) leadership asked its Advisory Council to review NINDS efforts in the domains of diversity, equity, inclusion, and health inequities. Part of these efforts involved a focus on health equity training and health equity research workforce diversification activities. The objective of this article was to summarize the findings and make recommendations regarding these training activities. Methods: A subgroup of the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council Working Group for Health Disparities and Inequities in Neurological Disorders was engaged to advise NINDS leadership in the domain of diversity in health equity training. Activities included video teleconference meetings, multiple consultations with experienced leaders in the field, independent writing assignments, and an open public discussion as part of the NINDS HEADWAY workshop held on September 22-24, 2021. Results: The working group recommends support for 2 distinct types of training activities: one designed for scientists from historically under-represented backgrounds and the second designed for scientists of all backgrounds performing health inequities research. Support for grant writing workshops and establishment of multi-institutional mentorship networks are recommended as potentially especially high-yield activities. The working group recommends that all NINDS-supported investigators should have sufficient diversity, equity, and inclusion training to be prepared and qualified to mentor trainees from under-represented backgrounds and mentor trainees engaged in health disparities research; there should be no "diversity tax" placed on established investigators from under-represented backgrounds to shoulder all the mentorship responsibilities. Among other recommendations, training in health disparities research should include a focus on interventional studies to alleviate inequities as well as social science and qualitative methods. Discussion: There is a great deal of work to do in the field of diversity, equity, inclusion, and health inequities training, but we are optimistic that the activities outlined here, if fully implemented, will set us on the right track.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?