Abstract:Effective conservation requires a variety of perspectives that center on different ways of knowing. Disciplinary diversity and inclusion (DDI) offers an important means of integrating different ways of knowing into pressing conservation challenges. However, DDI means more than multiple disciplinary approaches to conservation; cognitive diversity and epistemic justice are key. In 2020, the Disciplinary Inclusion Task Force was formed via a grassroots movement of the Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) to assess the extent of DDI and to chart a path to increase DDI. First, we assessed past and present SCB governance documents. Next, we surveyed current SCB members (n = 577). Finally, we surveyed nonmember conservationists (n = 213). Members who were not biological scientists perceived SCB as less diverse (21.4% vs. 16%) and not equitable (21.8% vs. 161%), and, although the majority (44) of nonmembers reported that their work aligned reasonably well with the mission of the SCB, they thought the organization focused on biological sciences. Despite SCB's mission to be diverse and inclusive, realizing this mission will likely require diverse epistemological perspectives and shifting from top‐down models of knowledge transfer. In centering on DDI, SCB can achieve its aspirations of connecting members across disciplines and ways of knowing to foster diverse perspectives and practices. We recommend that SCB and other organizations develop mechanisms to increase recruitment and retention of diverse members and leadership as well as expand strategic partnerships to flatten disciplinary hierarchies and promote inclusivity. Amplificación de la diversidad disciplinaria e inclusión en las ciencias y práctica de la conservación basada en un estudio de caso de la Sociedad para la Biología de la Conservación Resumen La conservación efectiva requiere de una variedad de perspectivas que se centran en diferentes formas de saber. La diversidad e inclusión disciplinaria (DID) ofrece un medio importante para integrar las diferentes formas de saber dentro de los desafíos urgentes de la conservación. La DID es más que varios enfoques disciplinarios de la conservación pues la diversidad cognitiva y la justicia epistémica también son importantes. En 2020 se formó el Grupo de Trabajo para la Inclusión Disciplinaria con un movimiento de base en la Sociedad para la Biología de la Conservación (SCB) para evaluar el alcance de la DID y para trazar un camino para amplificarla. Primero analizamos los documentos antiguos y actuales de gestión de la SCB. Después encuestamos a miembros actuales de la SCB (n = 577) y finalmente encuestamos a conservacionistas que no son miembros (n = 213). Los miembros que no son biólogos percibieron a la SCB como menos diversa (21.4% vs. 16%) y no equitativa (21.8% vs. 161%). Aunque la mayoría (44) de los no miembros reportaron que su trabajo se alinea razonablemente bien con la misión de la SCB, también creen que la SCB se enfoca en ciencias biológicas. A pesar de que la misión de la SCB es ser diversa e inclusiva, lograrla probablemente requerirá de perspectivas epistemológicas diversas y un cambio en los modelos de transferencia de conocimiento de arriba abajo. Si se centra en la DID, la SCB puede lograr conectar a los miembros de diferentes disciplinas y diferentes formas de saber para así promover las prácticas y perspectivas diversas. Recomendamos a la SCB y a otras organizaciones que desarrollen mecanismos para incrementar el reclutamiento y la retención de miembros y líderes diversos, así como expandir las alianzas estratégicas para reducir las jerarquías disciplinarias y promover la inclusión.

Embracing diversity and inclusivity in an academic setting: Insights from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping

Embracing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Scientific Community—Viewpoints of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee of the North American Vascular Biology Organization

Increasing Diversity in Canadian Radiology: From the Hiring Process to Needed Active Retention Efforts

The journey to building a diverse, equitable, and inclusive American Medical Informatics Association

Investment, integration, and innovation: Fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion across the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study consortium

Inclusive Approaches for Measuring Demographics of Underrepresented Populations in STEM and Biomedical Research Training Programs

Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data

A Retrospective Analysis of Leadership, Awardees, and Member Gender Representation of the Canadian Society for Immunology

Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender

Guidelines for Inclusive and Diverse Human Neuroscience Research Practices

Pathways to Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Marine Science and Conservation

Diversity and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Surgery from Medical School to Practice: AOA Critical Issues

Junior scientists spotlight social bonds in seminars for diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare and Academic Radiology: A Critical Examination of Demographic Disparities in 2023

Diversity, equity, and inclusion in anesthesiology

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Health Inequities Training in Neurologic Disorders and Stroke: Analysis and Recommendations From the NINDS Advisory Council Working Group

Enhancing disciplinary diversity and inclusion in conservation science and practice based on a case study of the Society for Conservation Biology

Defining interventions and metrics to improve diversity in CNS clinical trial participation: A SNO and RANO effort

Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences—An OHBM–Open Science perspective

Comparison of women and men in biomedical informatics scientific dissemination: retrospective observational case study of the AMIA Annual Symposium: 2017-2020