Abstract:Over the past decades, the field of neurology has witnessed groundbreaking progress in both diagnostics and therapeutics, including the description and characterization of new antibody-mediated syndromes, development of advanced neuroimaging and monitoring techniques, major advances in treatment of acute stroke, and countless new treatments for epilepsy and multiple sclerosis, to name just a few. However, these advances are only accessible to a small proportion of the world's patients with neurologic conditions due to large disparities in access to neurologic care. Barriers to receiving advanced neurologic care include lack of access to resources (due to cost, distance from resources, or both), insufficient public health infrastructure, urban–rural healthcare gaps, limited training opportunities for clinicians, and social determinants of health particularly affecting marginalized populations. In this issue of Seminars in Neurology , we highlight the work of colleagues who have dedicated their careers to addressing these disparities in neurologic care. Authors from 11 countries (Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ethiopia, Mexico, Nepal, Peru, Ukraine, United States, and Zambia) across 5 continents describe challenges in improving neurologic care, education, and research in underserved regions and for marginalized populations, and provide frameworks for how they have addressed these challenges through their work. Through these articles we learn how inpatient neurology services, acute stroke treatment, epilepsy care, neurology training, and research infrastructure have been developed in different world regions that previously had little or no access to neurology care. We learn about the unique challenges faced by neurologists caring for patients in a country at war and patients who have been forcibly displaced. While many of these challenges may seem geographically distant from neurologists practicing in high-resource settings, the authors of articles in this issue also teach us about the unique challenges facing underserved and marginalized populations in high-resource settings related to race and ethnicity, sex and gender, and social determinants of health, and how to improve care for these populations. These articles highlight ongoing inequities, disparities, and challenges. But they also provide hope and inspiration. The authors describe ongoing efforts to improve the neurologic care of patients and populations, educate the next generation of neurologists, and increase research into how best to serve all patients with neurologic disease. We hope that highlighting these authors' work will increase awareness of the issues facing patients and clinicians worldwide and the ongoing tireless efforts of dedicated individuals to increase access to neurology care, education, and research where it is limited or nonexistent. We also hope these articles will provide a framework that helps us all think about how to improve the care of underserved and marginalized populations and how to engage in ethical, mutually beneficial collaborations toward that goal in diverse contexts. We are deeply grateful to each of the authors for their generosity in sharing their important and inspiring work through these articles. We also wish to express our sincere thanks to Dr. David Greer and Dr. Ariane Lewis for inviting us to guest edit this issue of Seminars in Neurology and for their guidance and mentorship. Article published online: 17 April 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Seven Strategies to Integrate Equity within Translational Research in Neurology

Innovation at the Intersection: Emerging Translational Research in Neurology and Psychiatry

Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries

Translational Neuroscience: Toward New Therapies

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Health Inequities Training in Neurologic Disorders and Stroke: Analysis and Recommendations From the NINDS Advisory Council Working Group

Preclinical research (on rare diseases): we need to talk about health equity

Underrepresented and Underserved Populations in Neurological Research

Defining interventions and metrics to improve diversity in CNS clinical trial participation: A SNO and RANO effort

Best Practice Recommendations for Integrating Health Equity into Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Dementia Care

Opportunities to Advance Equity Through Implementation Strategy Design

Building Equitable Neuroscience Research Collaborations in Resource-limited Settings

Accelerators: Sparking Innovation and Transdisciplinary Team Science in Disparities Research

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Research: A Path Toward Precision Health for Everyone

Use of Community-Engaged Research Approaches in Clinical Interventions for Neurologic Disorders in the United States: A Scoping Review and Future Directions for Improving Health Equity Research

Racial and ethnic socioenvironmental inequity and neuroimaging in psychiatry: a brief review of the past and recommendations for the future

Creation to Dissemination: A Roadmap for Health Equity Research

Health equity integrated epilepsy care and research: A narrative review

Re-Engaging Individuals & Societies for Structural Evolution: A Brain Health Equity Neuropsychology Research Framework

Advancing a mission of translational intervention science: Comment on premature implementation.

Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare

Neurology in Underserved and Marginalized Populations