Abstract:The linear no-threshold (LNT) model may be useful as a simple basis for developing radiation protection regulations and standards, but it bears little resemblance to scientific reality and is probably overly conservative at low doses and low dose rates. This paper is an appeal for a broader view of radiation protection that involves more than just optimization of radiation dose. It is suggested that the LNT model should be replaced with a risk-informed, targeted approach to limitation of overall risks, which include radiation and other types of risks and accidents/incidents. The focus should be on protection of the individual. Limitation of overall risk does not necessarily always equate to minimization of individual or collective doses, but in some cases it might. Instead, risk assessment (hazards analysis) should be performed for each facility/and or specific job or operation (straightforward for specialized work such as radiography), and this should guide how limited resources are used to protect workers and the public. A graded approach could be used to prioritize the most significant risks and identify exposure scenarios that are unlikely or non-existent. The dose limits would then represent an acceptable level of risk, below which no further reduction in dose would be needed. Less resources should be spent on ALARA and tracking small individual and collective doses. Present dose limits are thought to be conservative and should suffice in general. Two exceptions are possibly the need for a lower (lifetime) dose limit for lens of the eye for astronauts and raising the public limit to 5 mSv y −1 from 1 mSv y −1 . This would harmonize the public limit with the current limit for the embryo fetus of the declared pregnant worker. Eight case studies are presented that emphasize how diverse and complex radiation risks can be, and in some cases, chemical and industrial risks outweigh radiation risks. More focus is needed on prevention of accidents and incidents involving a variety of types of risks. A targeted approach is needed, and commitments should be complied with until they are changed or exemptions are granted. No criticism of regulators or nuclear industry personnel is intended here. Protection of workers and the public is everyone's goal. The question is how best to accomplish that.

How self-interest and deception led to the adoption of the linear non-threshold dose response (LNT) model for cancer risk assessment

A Review of Recent Low-dose Research and Recommendations for Moving Forward

The scientific nature of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model used in the system of radiological protection

Replace the Linear No-threshold Model with a Risk-informed Targeted Approach to Radiation Protection

How Hermann J. Muller Viewed the Ernest Sternglass Contributions to Hereditary and Cancer Risk Assessment

A Revised System of Radiological Protection Is Needed

Cancer Risk Associated with Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological and Biological Evidence

The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects

In Vivo Mammary Tumourigenesis in the Sprague-Dawley Rat and Microdosimetric Correlates

If You Torture Your Data Long Enough, It Will Confess to Anything: On the Epidemiological Basis of the LNT Model

Factors Influencing Effects of Low-dose Radiation Exposure

Recent discoveries on the historical foundations of cancer risk assessment: Shedding light on the limits of LNT

Comparison of data on Mutation Frequencies of Mice Caused by Radiation - Low Dose Model -

False Indications of Dose-Response Nonlinearity in Large Epidemiologic Cancer Radiation Cohort Studies; A Simulation Exercise

Unveiling variability and uncertainty for better science and decisions on cancer risks from environmental chemicals

Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector

"Lethal Mutations" a Misnomer or the Start of a Scientific Revolution?

First report of X-ray induced somatic mutation by Muller's department chair fails to support Muller's linearity hypothesis

Radiation Exposure Theory Comparison of data on Mutation Frequencies of Mice

Causal Machine Learning Analysis of Radiation-Induced Leukemia and Solid Tumor Incidence in Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors

Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation-Induced Blood Plasma Metabolic Response in A Diverse Genetic Mouse Population