Abstract:The linear no-threshold (LNT) model may be useful as a simple basis for developing radiation protection regulations and standards, but it bears little resemblance to scientific reality and is probably overly conservative at low doses and low dose rates. This paper is an appeal for a broader view of radiation protection that involves more than just optimization of radiation dose. It is suggested that the LNT model should be replaced with a risk-informed, targeted approach to limitation of overall risks, which include radiation and other types of risks and accidents/incidents. The focus should be on protection of the individual. Limitation of overall risk does not necessarily always equate to minimization of individual or collective doses, but in some cases it might. Instead, risk assessment (hazards analysis) should be performed for each facility/and or specific job or operation (straightforward for specialized work such as radiography), and this should guide how limited resources are used to protect workers and the public. A graded approach could be used to prioritize the most significant risks and identify exposure scenarios that are unlikely or non-existent. The dose limits would then represent an acceptable level of risk, below which no further reduction in dose would be needed. Less resources should be spent on ALARA and tracking small individual and collective doses. Present dose limits are thought to be conservative and should suffice in general. Two exceptions are possibly the need for a lower (lifetime) dose limit for lens of the eye for astronauts and raising the public limit to 5 mSv y −1 from 1 mSv y −1 . This would harmonize the public limit with the current limit for the embryo fetus of the declared pregnant worker. Eight case studies are presented that emphasize how diverse and complex radiation risks can be, and in some cases, chemical and industrial risks outweigh radiation risks. More focus is needed on prevention of accidents and incidents involving a variety of types of risks. A targeted approach is needed, and commitments should be complied with until they are changed or exemptions are granted. No criticism of regulators or nuclear industry personnel is intended here. Protection of workers and the public is everyone's goal. The question is how best to accomplish that.

A Review of Recent Low-dose Research and Recommendations for Moving Forward

Replace the Linear No-threshold Model with a Risk-informed Targeted Approach to Radiation Protection

The scientific nature of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model used in the system of radiological protection

How self-interest and deception led to the adoption of the linear non-threshold dose response (LNT) model for cancer risk assessment

Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology

A Revised System of Radiological Protection Is Needed

Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector

Cancer Risk Associated with Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological and Biological Evidence

A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation

The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects

CONJUNCTURAL APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF LOW DOSE RADIATION RANGE WITH LOW LET IN FOREIGN REVIEW SOURCES: NO CHANGES FOR 18 YEARS

Old enemy, new threat: you can't solve today's problems with yesterday's solution

Is It Time to Rethink Radiation Safety Standards?

Dose-Response after Low-dose Ionizing Radiation: Evidence from Life Span Study with Data-driven Deep Neural Network Model

Society and Nuclear Energy: What Is the Role for Radiological Protection?

The Response of Living Organisms to Low Radiation Environment and Its Implications in Radiation Protection

Factors Influencing Effects of Low-dose Radiation Exposure

Interplay of immune modulation, adaptive response and hormesis: Suggestive of threshold for clinical manifestation of effects of ionizing radiation at low doses?

Proposed Priorities for Low-Dose Radiation Research and Their Relevance to the Practice of Radiology

History, current status, and trends of radiation protection standards

Effects of low dose and low dose rate low linear energy transfer radiation on animals – review of recent studies relevant for carcinogenesis