Abstract:The linear no-threshold (LNT) model may be useful as a simple basis for developing radiation protection regulations and standards, but it bears little resemblance to scientific reality and is probably overly conservative at low doses and low dose rates. This paper is an appeal for a broader view of radiation protection that involves more than just optimization of radiation dose. It is suggested that the LNT model should be replaced with a risk-informed, targeted approach to limitation of overall risks, which include radiation and other types of risks and accidents/incidents. The focus should be on protection of the individual. Limitation of overall risk does not necessarily always equate to minimization of individual or collective doses, but in some cases it might. Instead, risk assessment (hazards analysis) should be performed for each facility/and or specific job or operation (straightforward for specialized work such as radiography), and this should guide how limited resources are used to protect workers and the public. A graded approach could be used to prioritize the most significant risks and identify exposure scenarios that are unlikely or non-existent. The dose limits would then represent an acceptable level of risk, below which no further reduction in dose would be needed. Less resources should be spent on ALARA and tracking small individual and collective doses. Present dose limits are thought to be conservative and should suffice in general. Two exceptions are possibly the need for a lower (lifetime) dose limit for lens of the eye for astronauts and raising the public limit to 5 mSv y −1 from 1 mSv y −1 . This would harmonize the public limit with the current limit for the embryo fetus of the declared pregnant worker. Eight case studies are presented that emphasize how diverse and complex radiation risks can be, and in some cases, chemical and industrial risks outweigh radiation risks. More focus is needed on prevention of accidents and incidents involving a variety of types of risks. A targeted approach is needed, and commitments should be complied with until they are changed or exemptions are granted. No criticism of regulators or nuclear industry personnel is intended here. Protection of workers and the public is everyone's goal. The question is how best to accomplish that.

The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects

Factors Influencing Effects of Low-dose Radiation Exposure

Threshold doses and circulatory disease risks

Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology

Interplay of immune modulation, adaptive response and hormesis: Suggestive of threshold for clinical manifestation of effects of ionizing radiation at low doses?

Global Gene Expression Alterations as a Crucial Constituent of Human Cell Response to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation Exposure

Adaptive responses to low doses of radiation or chemicals: their cellular and molecular mechanisms

Immune system modulation by low-dose ionizing radiation-induced adaptive response

The Response of Living Organisms to Low Radiation Environment and Its Implications in Radiation Protection

Accumulation of sublethal radiation damage and its effect on cell survival

Replace the Linear No-threshold Model with a Risk-informed Targeted Approach to Radiation Protection

Ionizing Radiation-Induced Epigenetic Modifications and Their Relevance to Radiation Protection

The Increase in Animal Mortality Risk following Exposure to Sparsely Ionizing Radiation Is Not Linear Quadratic with Dose

Low dose ionizing radiation and the immune response: what is the role of non-targeted effects?

Radiation-induced bystander effect and its clinical implications

A Revised System of Radiological Protection Is Needed

Adaptive Responses to Low-Dose/Low-Dose-Rate γ Rays in Normal Human Fibroblasts: The Role of Growth Architecture and Oxidative Metabolism

Dose-Dependent Shift in Relative Contribution of Homologous Recombination to DNA Repair after Low-LET Ionizing Radiation Exposure: Empirical Evidence and Numerical Simulation

Differential biological effect of low doses of ionizing radiation depending on the radiosensitivity in a cell line model

A Review of Recent Low-dose Research and Recommendations for Moving Forward

Low-dose radiation induces adaptive response in normal cells, but not in tumor cells: in vitro and in vivo studies.