Abstract:Objective: Current European restraint systems may not realize their full protection potential in real-world frontal crashes because they are highly optimized for specific conditions. This research sought to quantify the potential benefit of adapting seat belt load limit thresholds to a wider range of occupant and crash characteristics.Methods: Numerical simulations using Hybrid III dummies were conducted to determine how varying load limiter thresholds could affect occupant kinematics and injury outcome in frontal impacts. Occupant-compartment models were developed with a restraint system consisting of a frontal airbag and a 3-point belt with retractor, buckle pretensioner, and load limiting at the shoulder. Load limiting threshold was varied in 5 frontal impact scenarios, covering as wide a range of real frontal crash conditions as possible. The simulated thoracic injury risks were converted into injury probability values using Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2+ age-dependent thoracic risk curves. These values were then applied to a British real-world frontal impact sample to determine the injury reduction potential of optimized load limiting, taking into account occupant seating position, impact scenario, occupant size, and occupant age and assuming that an appropriate adaptive system was fitted to all cars.Results: In low-severity impacts, a low load limit provided the best chest protection, without increasing risk to other body regions, for both the 50th and 95th percentile dummies in both front seating positions. In high-severity impacts, the low limit was not recommended because it allowed the driver dummy to move into close proximity with the vehicle interior, although there appeared to be some benefit of lower load limiting for the 50th percentile front passenger dummy, due to the increased ride down space in that seating position. Adapting the load limit showed no injury reduction potential for 5th percentile drivers. Utilizing the best load limit threshold in real-world crashes could reduce the number of occupants with AIS 2+ chest injuries from belt loading from 377 to 251 (a 33% reduction), correspondingly reducing the number of occupants with AIS 2+ chest injuries (from all sources) in the whole frontal impact population from 496 to 370. This is a reduction in injury rate from 6.4% to 4.8%.Conclusions: The concept of an adaptive load limiter shows most promise in low-speed frontal crashes where it could lower the AIS 2+ chest injury risk for most front seat occupants, except the smallest of drivers. Generally, adaptive limiters show less potential effectiveness with increased crash severities. Overall, an intelligent adjustment of load limiting threshold could result in a reduction of at least a third of front seat occupants with AIS 2+ chest injuries associated with restraining loads and an overall reduction in AIS 2+ chest injury rate in frontal crashes from 6.4% to 4.8.

The effect of seatbelt pre-tensioners and load limiters in the reduction of MAIS 2+, MAIS 3+, and fatal injuries in real-world frontal crashes

AIS 3+ Thoracic Injuries Among Drivers in Real-World Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes: The Effect of Impact Direction, Impact Location and Status of Seat Belt

Effectiveness of Booster Seats Compared with No Restraint or Seat Belt Alone for Crash Injury Prevention

A Simulation Study on the Efficacy of Advanced Belt Restraints to Mitigate the Effects of Obesity for Rear-Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes

Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity

Effects of Automated Emergency Braking and Seatbelt Pre-Pretensioning on Occupant Injury Risks in High-Severity Frontal Crashes

Population-based assessment of a vehicle fleet with seat belts providing lower shoulder belt forces than today

The effects of airbags and seatbelts on occupant injury in longitudinal barrier crashes

Motor Vehicle Restraint System Use and Risk of Spine Injury

A Matched-Cohort Analysis of Belted Front and Rear Seat Occupants in Newer and Older Model Vehicles Shows That Gains in Front Occupant Safety Have Outpaced Gains for Rear Seat Occupants

Parameter study for child injury mitigation in near-side impacts through FE simulations

Driver injury in near- and far-side impacts: Update on the effect of front passenger belt use

Effects of an integrated safety system for swivel seat arrangements in frontal crash

Optimization of the Driver’s Seat Belt and Injury Biomechanical Analysis in Real-World Minivan Small Offset Impact Accident Scenarios

Factors influencing the effectiveness of occupant retention under far-side impacts: A parametric study

Influence of Vehicle Model Year and Occupant Seating Position on Serious Injury Risk in Near-Side Collision

The Combined Effects of Impact Direction and Impact Location on Serious-to-Maximum Injuries among Drivers in Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes

Evaluation of AIS3+ car occupant injuries using deterministic and probabilistic methods in frontal crashes

Driver Injury from Vehicle Side Impacts When Automatic Emergency Braking and Active Seat Belts Are Used

Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Occupant Characteristics on Contemporary Seat Belt Payout Behavior in Frontal Impacts.

Severe injury in multiple impacts: Analysis of 1997-2015 NASS-CDS