Abstract:PURPOSE:To assess the three-dimensional (3D) accuracy of multi-implant impressions for complete arches obtained using 3D printing technology, and to determine the clinical feasibility of this approach by comparing the results obtained with those obtained with conventional impression techniques.MATERIALS AND METHODS:A maxillary model matrix with four implant analogs was used to fabricate 10 stone reference models (control) to simulate edentulous patients. Ten 3D-printed impressions were made using polylactic acid custom open trays with component splinting (3D-printed group). To make 10 conventional impressions of the reference models, the poly(methyl methacrylate) open trays with splinting technique was used (conventional group). Impressions were poured with a type IV dental stone, which had been digitalized utilizing a high-resolution laboratory scanner after connecting the polymer scan bodies. Standard tessellation language (STL) datasets from the two groups of stone models were superimposed with the corresponding reference models. The interimplant distances and interimplant angulations for each implant pair were measured for the reference models and for the two test groups' definitive models, to assess 3D deviations. In addition, the mechanical properties of polylactic acid and poly(methyl methacrylate) tray materials were compared by means of three-point loading and tensile bond tests. The Student t test was used to compare the differences in implant position and mechanical properties between the two groups, while implant angulations were analyzed with Wilcoxon's rank-sum test, at P = .05.RESULTS:There was less implant-position deviation for the 3D-printed group (mean ± SD: 56.37 ± 12.52 μm) than for the conventional group (71.94 ± 18.86 μm) (P = .014). No significant differences were found in angular deviation between the two groups (P > .05). Flexural strength results suggested that polylactic acid (112.7 ± 1.62 MPa) was stronger than poly(methyl methacrylate) (104.0 ± 2.17 MPa; P < .0001). The tensile bond strength of polylactic acid (0.07 ± 0.005 MPa) was higher than that of poly(methyl methacrylate) (0.03 ± 0.004 MPa; P < .0001).CONCLUSION:The 3D-printing multi-implant impression technique could be an alternative to conventional impression techniques for complete arches.

A stitching algorithm of still pictures with camera translation

[Quantitative Evaluation of Printing Accuracy and Tissue Surface Adaptation of Mandibular Complete Denture Polylactic Acid Pattern Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling Technology].

Evaluation Of Adaptation Of The Polylactic Acid Pattern Of Maxillary Complete Dentures Fabricated By Fused Deposition Modelling Technology: A Pilot Study

Control of abnormal guanine nucleotide concentrations in dystrophic mouse muscle.

Accuracy of Multi-Implant Impressions Using 3D-Printing Custom Trays and Splinting Versus Conventional Techniques for Complete Arches.

How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer?

Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy

Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies

Design Parameters of Polylactic Acid Custom Trays Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling for Partial Edentulism: Consideration of the Accuracy of the Definitive Cast

3D printing PLGA: a quantitative examination of the effects of polymer composition and printing parameters on print resolution

Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of complete-arch cast manufactured by six 3D printers

Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

Assessing the Radiological Density and Accuracy of Mandible Polymer Anatomical Structures Manufactured Using 3D Printing Technologies

Accuracy of Mandibular Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated by 3D Printing and Conventional Techniques

Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering

Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides

Accuracy and clinical fit of milled versus rapid prototyped orthognathic surgical splints

Effect of 3D printer, implant analog and angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts

A Conversation on Adhesive Dentistry.

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions