Abstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Altering the internal design of 3-dimensionally (3D) printed dental casts may help to reduce material and time consumption. However, it remains unclear whether such changes would compromise the accuracy of the casts. Further research is also needed to determine the optimal internal design that would maximize printing accuracy.PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of internal design on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed dental casts fabricated by stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) technology.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A reference digital cast was obtained by scanning a maxillary typodont with an intraoral scanner to create 4 types of internal designs, including hollow interior with perforated base (HWB), hollow interior without base (HB), all solid (S), and internal support structure with perforated base (SWB). Digital casts with different internal designs were printed by two 3D printers with different technologies (SLA and DLP). The printed casts were scanned by a desktop scanner to obtain standard tessellation language (STL) format research digital casts. All reference and research digital casts were imported into a software program for comparison and analysis of accuracy. Differences between the reference and research digital casts were quantitatively indicated by the root mean square (RMS) value. The Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA was used to test significant differences between the different internal design types and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to test significant differences between the two 3D printers (α=.05).RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in the trueness and precision of different internal design types (all P<.001) for casts printed by both 3D printers. The trueness and precision were significantly worse for the HB design than for the other design types for casts printed by both 3D printers (all P<.05). Regardless of the design type, the trueness was significantly better for casts printed by the SLA-based printer than for casts printed by the DLP-based printer (all P<.05). The precision was significantly worse for casts printed by the SLA-based printer than for casts printed by the DLP-based printer (all P<.05).CONCLUSIONS: The internal design may affect the accuracy of 3D printing. The base is necessary to ensure the accuracy of 3D printed dental casts, whereas the internal support structure did not affect the accuracy of 3D printed dental casts. An all-solid design led to higher precision, but not higher trueness. Dental casts printed with SLA technology have higher trueness and lower precision than those printed with DLP technology.

Design Parameters of Polylactic Acid Custom Trays Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling for Partial Edentulism: Consideration of the Accuracy of the Definitive Cast

Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology

Computer Aided Design and 3-Dimensional Printing for the Production of Custom Trays of Maxillary Edentulous Jaws Based on 3-Dimensional Scan of Primary Impression

Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: A self-controlled clinical trial

Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study

Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.

Clinical evaluation of tissue stops on 3D-printed custom trays

Potential for bracket bonding errors based on tray accuracy and fit: Evaluation of 6 photopolymer resins for indirect bonding trays

Evaluation Of Adaptation Of The Polylactic Acid Pattern Of Maxillary Complete Dentures Fabricated By Fused Deposition Modelling Technology: A Pilot Study

[Quantitative Evaluation of Printing Accuracy and Tissue Surface Adaptation of Mandibular Complete Denture Polylactic Acid Pattern Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling Technology].

Novel Method of Fabricating Individual Trays for Maxillectomy Patients by Computer-Aided Design and Rapid Prototyping.

Evaluation of Implant Impression Accuracy Using Different Trays and Techniques with a 3D Superimposition Method

In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study

Accuracy of Multi-Implant Impressions Using 3D-Printing Custom Trays and Splinting Versus Conventional Techniques for Complete Arches.

Evaluation of a Novel 3D-Printed Custom Tray for the Impressions of Edentulous Jaws.

Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters

[Evaluation of Production and Clinical Working Time of Computer-Aided Design/computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Custom Trays for Complete Denture].

Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom edentulous mandible trays

Establishment and Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Edentulous Custom Trays Designed and Fabricated by Chair-Side CAD and 3D Printing Systems

Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering

Comparative Verification of the Accuracy of Implant Models Made of PLA, Resin, and Silicone