Effect of different framework materials on stresses induced in distal extension removable partial dentures: A strain gauge analysis

Maha Mahmoud Fahmy,Mahmoud Hassan Al‐Afandy,Hebatallah Tarek Mohamed,Ahmed Mostafa Abdelfattah Mohamed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13847
2024-03-25
Journal of Prosthodontics
Abstract:Purpose Evaluation of the strain transmitted to the abutments and residual ridge by polyetherketoneketone material compared to the cobalt‐chromium one in distal extension removable partial dentures (RPDs) to fulfill the objective of preservation of the supporting structures. Materials and Methods A virtual model simulating a Kennedy class I partially edentulous mandibular arch was designed. Two models, one for each group, were printed. Five RPDs were made in each group. In group CR, the framework was milled from a cobalt‐chromium alloy. While in group PK, it was milled from a polyetherketoneketone blank. Strain gauge rosettes were bonded distal to the last abutment and posteriorly in the distal end of the residual ridge. Unilateral vertical and oblique loadings were applied. Mann‐Whitney U test was used for inter‐group comparisons while the Friedman test was used for intra‐group comparisons and corrected by Wilcoxon Signed‐Rank Sum. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results During unilateral vertical load application, a statistically significant difference was found between both groups distal to the abutment in the loaded and unloaded sides as well as the residual ridge on the unloaded side. During oblique load application, a statistically significant difference was found between both groups in all slots. Conclusion Polyetherketoneketone material induces less stress on the abutments and more stress on the residual ridges compared to the cobalt‐chromium ones. Therefore, it may be recommended for weak abutments supporting RPDs.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?