Abstract:Importance: Functional status is a patient-centered outcome that is important for a meaningful gain in health-related quality of life after aortic valve replacement. Objective: To determine functional status trajectories in the year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up was conducted at a single academic center in 246 patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The study was conducted between February 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017; data analysis was performed from December 27, 2017, to May 7, 2018. Exposures: Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed and a deficit-accumulation frailty index (CGA-FI) (range, 0-1; higher values indicate greater frailty) was calculated. Main outcomes and measures: Telephone interviews were conducted to assess self-reported ability to perform 22 activities and physical tasks at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the procedure. Results: Of the 246 patients included in the study, 143 underwent TAVR (74 [51.7%] women; mean [SD] age, 84.2 [5.9] years), and 103 underwent SAVR (46 [44.7%] women; age, 78.1 [5.3] years). Five trajectories were identified based on functional status at baseline and during the follow-up: from excellent at baseline to improvement at follow-up (excellent baseline-improvement), good (high baseline-full recovery), fair (moderate baseline-minimal decline), poor (low baseline-moderate decline), and very poor (low baseline-large decline). After TAVR, the most common trajectory was fair (54 [37.8%]), followed by good (33 [23.1%]), poor (21 [14.7%]), excellent (20 [14.0%]), and very poor (12 [8.4%]) trajectories. After SAVR, the most common trajectory was good (39 [37.9%]), followed by excellent (38 [36.9%]), fair (20 [19.4%]), poor (3 [2.9%]), and very poor (1 [1.0%]) trajectories. Preoperative frailty level was associated with lower probability of functional improvement and greater probability of functional decline. After TAVR, patients with CGA-FI level of 0.20 or lower had excellent (3 [50.0%]) or good (3 [50.0%]) trajectories, whereas most patients with CGA-FI level of 0.51 or higher had poor (10 [45.5%]) or very poor (5 [22.7%]) trajectories. After SAVR, most patients with CGA-FI level of 0.20 or lower had excellent (24 [58.5%]) or good (15 [36.6%]) trajectories compared with a fair trajectory (5 [71.4%]) in those with CGA-FI levels of 0.41 to 0.50. Postoperative delirium and major complications were associated with functional decline after TAVR (delirium present vs absent: 14 [50.0%] vs 11 [13.4%]; complications present vs absent: 14 [51.9%] vs 19 [16.4%]) or lack of improvement after SAVR (delirium present vs absent: 27 [69.2%] vs 31 [81.6%]; complications present vs absent: 10 [62.5%] vs 69 [79.3%]). Conclusions and relevance: The findings suggest that functional decline or lack of improvement is common in older adults with severe frailty undergoing TAVR or SAVR. Although this nonrandomized study does not allow comparison of the effectiveness between TAVR and SAVR, anticipated functional trajectories may inform patient-centered decision making and perioperative care to optimize functional outcomes.

Functional continuum: independent predictor of one-year mortality and key decision-making element in older adults with severe aortic stenosis amenable to aortic valve replacement

FRAILTY ASSESSMENT AND 6-MONTH FUNCTIONAL STATUS AND MORTALITY AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Impact of a New Preoperative Stratification Based on Cardiac Structural Compromise in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery

Long-term predictors of mortality and functional recovery after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction

The Positive Impact of Early Frailty Levels on Mortality in Elderly Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter/Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Survival penalty in patients undergoing transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: is it just a question of frailty? Insights from a large cohort with demographic matching

Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study

Predictors of Survival after Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Low-Flow and High-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Impact of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Late Elderly Patients

Usefulness of aortic valve calcification in patients with low flow aortic stenosis

Early and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement in septuagenarians and octogenarians with severe aortic stenosis

ANMCO/SIC/SICI-GISE/SICCH Executive Summary of Consensus Document on Risk Stratification in elderly patients with aortic stenosis before surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Evaluation of Changes in Functional Status in the Year After Aortic Valve Replacement

[Value of coordinated geriatric and cardiological expertise in elderly patients' eligibility for percutaneous aortic valve replacement]

The Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Survival in Patients with Normal Flow Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: a Propensity-Matched Comparison.

569 IMPACT OF FRAILTY ON VERY LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION (TAVI) IN A HIGH-FLOW REFERRAL CENTER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Mid-term prognostic value of the novel staging of cardiac damage in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis

Long-term survival and outcomes according to age for patients underwent to transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Long-term survival and ourtomes a large cohort of patients underwent with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: an 10-year single center TAVR experience

Multimodality imaging to assess severity and outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: a medium-long term follow-up study