Abstract:Importance: Functional status is a patient-centered outcome that is important for a meaningful gain in health-related quality of life after aortic valve replacement. Objective: To determine functional status trajectories in the year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up was conducted at a single academic center in 246 patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The study was conducted between February 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017; data analysis was performed from December 27, 2017, to May 7, 2018. Exposures: Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed and a deficit-accumulation frailty index (CGA-FI) (range, 0-1; higher values indicate greater frailty) was calculated. Main outcomes and measures: Telephone interviews were conducted to assess self-reported ability to perform 22 activities and physical tasks at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the procedure. Results: Of the 246 patients included in the study, 143 underwent TAVR (74 [51.7%] women; mean [SD] age, 84.2 [5.9] years), and 103 underwent SAVR (46 [44.7%] women; age, 78.1 [5.3] years). Five trajectories were identified based on functional status at baseline and during the follow-up: from excellent at baseline to improvement at follow-up (excellent baseline-improvement), good (high baseline-full recovery), fair (moderate baseline-minimal decline), poor (low baseline-moderate decline), and very poor (low baseline-large decline). After TAVR, the most common trajectory was fair (54 [37.8%]), followed by good (33 [23.1%]), poor (21 [14.7%]), excellent (20 [14.0%]), and very poor (12 [8.4%]) trajectories. After SAVR, the most common trajectory was good (39 [37.9%]), followed by excellent (38 [36.9%]), fair (20 [19.4%]), poor (3 [2.9%]), and very poor (1 [1.0%]) trajectories. Preoperative frailty level was associated with lower probability of functional improvement and greater probability of functional decline. After TAVR, patients with CGA-FI level of 0.20 or lower had excellent (3 [50.0%]) or good (3 [50.0%]) trajectories, whereas most patients with CGA-FI level of 0.51 or higher had poor (10 [45.5%]) or very poor (5 [22.7%]) trajectories. After SAVR, most patients with CGA-FI level of 0.20 or lower had excellent (24 [58.5%]) or good (15 [36.6%]) trajectories compared with a fair trajectory (5 [71.4%]) in those with CGA-FI levels of 0.41 to 0.50. Postoperative delirium and major complications were associated with functional decline after TAVR (delirium present vs absent: 14 [50.0%] vs 11 [13.4%]; complications present vs absent: 14 [51.9%] vs 19 [16.4%]) or lack of improvement after SAVR (delirium present vs absent: 27 [69.2%] vs 31 [81.6%]; complications present vs absent: 10 [62.5%] vs 69 [79.3%]). Conclusions and relevance: The findings suggest that functional decline or lack of improvement is common in older adults with severe frailty undergoing TAVR or SAVR. Although this nonrandomized study does not allow comparison of the effectiveness between TAVR and SAVR, anticipated functional trajectories may inform patient-centered decision making and perioperative care to optimize functional outcomes.

UTILITY OF A GENERAL PROGNOSTIC SCORE IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS WITH POOR OUTCOMES AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study

Predictors of Survival after Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Low-Flow and High-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

FRAILTY ASSESSMENT AND 6-MONTH FUNCTIONAL STATUS AND MORTALITY AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Prognostic factors associated with postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with aortic valve prolapse

Early and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement in septuagenarians and octogenarians with severe aortic stenosis

The Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Survival in Patients with Normal Flow Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: a Propensity-Matched Comparison.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Left Ventricular Functional Recovery Following Valve Replacement Surgery for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Impact of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Late Elderly Patients

Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves

Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: derivation and validation of the long-TAVI prediction model

Aortic Valve Replacement In Elderly Patients: Influence Of Concomitant Coronary Grafting On Late Survival

Evaluation of Changes in Functional Status in the Year After Aortic Valve Replacement

Prognostic Value of CT-Derived Myocardial Biomarkers: Extracellular Volume Fraction and Strain in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Risk prediction in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction undergoing TAVI

P1795Impact of severe aortic stenosis treatment strategy in low-risk patients: a propensity matched analysis of surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Evolution and prognostic impact of left ventricular myocardial work indices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Impact of a New Preoperative Stratification Based on Cardiac Structural Compromise in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery

Risk of mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis

A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study