Abstract:Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are the reference treatments for aortic stenosis. Conflicting data exist on late survival results of these two techniques. While randomised controlled trials (with highly selected patients) assert the non-inferiority of TAVR, real-world data from large registries (with potential uncorrected confounders) suggest the opposite. Comparing the survival rates of SAVR and TAVR with those of a matched reference population could help circumvent potential biases of direct procedural comparisons and quantify the impact of frailty on post-operative survival. Purpose Our study aims to compare the 5-year overall survival rates of SAVR, non-frail TAVR, and frail TAVR patients with the survival of their demographically matched reference population. Methods This study included all consecutive patients undergoing either SAVR or TAVR at a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and December 2021. Each patient underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment by an experienced geriatric team, from which a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was derived using a validated classification tree. Frailty was defined as a CFS ≥ 6, in accordance with ESC guidelines. The patients were stratified into 3 subgroups: SAVR, non-frail TAVR, and frail TAVR patients. For each subgroup, a corresponding reference population was generated using national actuarial tables to ensure individual-level matching based on age, gender, and year of observation. Survival of each subgroup was then compared to its corresponding reference population over a 5-year period using standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and one-sample logrank tests. Results Our cohort included 1183 SAVR, 254 non-frail TAVR, and 151 frail TAVR patients, with mean ages of 74.1, 85.4, and 85.7 years, and median EuroSCORE II of 2.0%, 4.2%, and 5.4%, respectively. Survival of SAVR patients was equivalent to the reference population (80.1 vs 80.9% survival; SMR = 1.06 [0.89 – 1.25]; p = 0.454; Figure 1A). Similarly, non-frail TAVR patients also achieved survival rates comparable to those of the reference population (50.9 vs 54.0% survival; SMR = 0.94 [0.76 – 1.18]; p = 0.549; Figure 1B). However, frail TAVR patients faced a significantly reduced survival rate (41.7% vs 54.0% survival; SMR = 1.48 [1.15 – 1.90]; p < 0.001; Figure 1C). The frailty of this subgroup could therefore explain a 48% increase in mortality risk compared with their reference population after 5 years. Conclusions Treating non-frail patients with aortic stenosis through TAVR or SAVR restores life expectancy to levels comparable with their reference population, challenging results from other real-world registries. In contrast, TAVR in frail patients is associated with worse survival, raising the question of treatment futility in this specific subgroup. Refining the selection of frail patients who may benefit from TAVR remains an important clinical challenge.

Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Usefulness of frailty assessment using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study on the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Clinical Frailty Scale Predicts Outcomes After Elective Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Impact of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Late Elderly Patients

569 IMPACT OF FRAILTY ON VERY LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION (TAVI) IN A HIGH-FLOW REFERRAL CENTER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Impact of multiple comorbidities on long-term mortality in older patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Impact of frailty on outcomes of patients undergoing elective endovascular thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

The Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Health Care Costs and Clinical Outcomes Based on Frailty Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis

FRAILTY ASSESSMENT AND 6-MONTH FUNCTIONAL STATUS AND MORTALITY AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

The Positive Impact of Early Frailty Levels on Mortality in Elderly Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter/Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Frailty as an independent predictor for midterm adverse outcomes in the elderly undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal cohort study

Functional continuum: independent predictor of one-year mortality and key decision-making element in older adults with severe aortic stenosis amenable to aortic valve replacement

A novel geriatric assessment frailty score predicts 2-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Impact of Pre-procedural Cerebrovascular Events on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Association Between Disease Severity and Frailty in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Association of preoperative clinical frailty and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-Derived Individual Patient Data

Comprehensive Myocardial Assessment by Computed Tomography: Impact on Short-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Survival penalty in patients undergoing transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: is it just a question of frailty? Insights from a large cohort with demographic matching

Predictive Value of Clinical Frailty Scale in Long Term Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction after In-Hospital Cardiac Rehabilitation