Abstract:Background: China is generally regarded internationally as an "authoritarian" state. Traditional definitions have assigned many negative connotations surrounding the term of authoritarian. We realize that it might not be considered value-neutral in other countries. But authoritarian in the Chinese context emphasizes more on centralized decision making, collectivism, coordinating all activities of the nation, and public support, which is considered a value-neutral term. Therefore, it is adopted in this paper. We would like to clarify this. Authoritarian governance is considered an important mechanism for developing China's economy and solving social problems. The COVID-19 crisis is no exception. Most of the current research on crisis management and government crises focuses on advanced, democratic countries. However, the consequences of crisis management by authoritarian governments have not been fully appreciated. Although prior research has addressed authoritarian initiatives to manage crises in China, authoritarian interventions have rarely been theorized in public health emergencies. Methods: Based on a literature review and theoretical analysis, we use a descriptive and qualitative approach to assess public health policies and mechanisms from an authoritarian perspective in China. In light of the key events and intervention measures of China's government in response to COVID-19, the strategic practices of the Communist Party of China (CPC) to construct, embody, or set political goals through authoritarian intervention in public health crisis management are discussed. Results: China's government responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a comprehensive authoritarian intervention, notably by establishing a top-down leadership mechanism, implementing a resolute lockdown, rapidly establishing square cabin hospitals, enhancing cooperation between different government departments, mobilizing a wide range of volunteer resources, enforcing the use of health codes, imposing mandatory quarantine on those returning from abroad, and implementing city-wide nucleic acid testing. These measures ensured that China was able to contain the outbreak quickly and reflect on the unique role of the Chinese authoritarian system in responding to public health crises. Conclusions: Our paper contributes to expanding the existing understanding of the relationship between crisis management and authoritarian system. China's response to COVID-19 exemplifies the unique strengths of authoritarian institutions in public health crisis management, which is a helpful and practical tool to further enhance the CPC's political legitimacy. As a socialist model of crisis management with Chinese characteristics, it may offer desirable experiences and lessons for other countries still ravaged by the epidemic.

From bureaucratic administration to effective intervention: Comparing early governmental responses to the COVID-19 virus across East Asian and western health systems

A Comparative Analysis of Government Responses to COVID-19 in the United States, China, and South Korea: Lessons from the Early Stage of the Pandemic

Effective COVID-19 Control: A Comparative Analysis of the Stringency and Timeliness of Government Responses in Asia

Effective COVID-19 Control: A Systematic and Comparative Analysis of the Stringency and Timeliness of Government Responses of Selected Countries and Subregions in Asia

New development: Administrative accountability and early responses during public health crises—lessons from Covid-19 in China

China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective

Characterizing the Patterns of China's Policies Against COVID-19: A Bibliometric Study.

Administrative Mechanism of Joint Participation and Cooperation in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan

Why Were Some Countries More Successful Than Others in Curbing Early COVID-19 Mortality Impact? A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis.

COVID-19 Pandemic Management: Best Practices and Lessons From China, Japan and South Korea

The Response of the Government's Emergency System to the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Combating COVID-19 Through Collaborative Governance: Lessons from East Asia

Governance Capability of the Public Health System: A Comparative Analysis of the Control of COVID-19 in the Different Provinces of China

COVID-19 in China: Responses, Challenges and Implications for the Health System

Seeking opportunities from crisis? China’s governance responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

Governing public health emergencies during the coronavirus disease outbreak: Lessons from four Chinese cities in the first wave

Seeking Opportunities From Crisis? China'S Governance Responses To The Covid-19 Pandemic

Coordinated Management of COVID-19 Response: Lessons From Whole-of-Society and Whole-of-Health Strategies in Wuhan, China

China’s Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Model for Epidemic Preparedness and Management

What Caused the Outbreak of COVID-19 in China: From the Perspective of Crisis Management

A tale of two city-states: A comparison of the state-led vs civil society-led responses to COVID-19 in Singapore and Hong Kong