The central importance of anxiety in common mental disorders
D. Goldberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413509698
2013-11-01
Abstract:Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(11) Despite the fact that the diagnosis of ‘anxious depression’ does not exist in either major classification, many investigators have recognised that it exists (Angst and Dobler-Mikola, 1985; Clayton et al., 1991; Fava et al., 2004; Rao and Zisook, 2009). Ormel et al. (1993) have shown that anxiety and depressive symptoms show synchrony of change, and Malhi et al. (2002) have stressed the importance of recognising the anxious face of depression. This has been at least partly remedied in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), where clinicians are required to use an ‘anxiety specifier’ whenever depression is diagnosed, relating to whether the depressive symptoms are accompanied by current anxious symptoms. Anxious symptoms cut across all common mental disorders (CMDs) except non-anxious depression and, in the case of both unipolar and bipolar depression, tend to make the outlook worse and suicide more likely (Goldberg and Fawcett, 2012). Leckman et al. (1983a) studied over 1300 first-degree relatives of 215 unipolar depressives, and found that if an anxiety disorder was present in addition to the depression, the relatives were at increased risk of depression, whether or not the anxious symptoms were present at the same time as the depressive symptoms. In contrast, the relatives of individuals with non-anxious depression were at no greater risk of depression, with or without anxiety, than normal controls. A related study showed that when depression was associated with symptoms of panic, relatives were more than twice as likely to have major depression, panic disorder, phobia and/or alcoholism than the relatives of probands with major depression without any anxiety disorder (Leckman et al., 1983b). A later family study showed that anxious depressives were more likely to have alcohol abuse, anxious personality and dramatic personality than pure depressives or controls, and were also much more likely to be diagnosed with alcohol abuse (Reich, 1993). Goldberg et al. (2013) have shown that the severity of anxious forms of depression is not entirely due to the presence of the additional anxious symptoms, since, even if these are discounted, the symptoms of depression are more likely to be particularly severe (e.g. early morning waking, weight loss, psychomotor retardation, diurnal variation of mood and guilt). Where the psychopathology among the parents of people with depression is concerned, those with non-anxious depression come from parents with depression on its own or accompanied by other anxiety disorders, excluding generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), while those with anxious depression come from parents with co-morbid GAD and major depression, with GAD alone or with other anxiety disorders on their own, and with mania. Finally, anxious and non-anxious depressions have different personality characteristics: anxious depressives are more likely to be harm avoidant and less likely to be novelty-seeking than controls, while non-anxious depression are no more harm avoidant than controls, but are more likely to have a high value for novelty seeking (Goldberg et al., 2013). Both the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the DSM classifications conflate these two forms of depression, since the concept of ‘major depression’ defines a heterogeneous collection of depressive states, creating a bogus order out of anarchy. Our diagnostic rules come at a price: not only are anxious symptoms ignored as though they do not exist, but even worse we include dissimilar depressive states in treatment studies, rather than acknowledging that inert, apathetic depressions respond differently than anxious, agitated depressions (Fava et al., 2008). Since non-anxious depressions respond better to treatment than anxious depressions, their presence in a study that does not discriminate between the two forms of depression will provide a more optimistic outcome compared to a study that considered only anxious depression. Our classifications allow us to consider anxiety with depression only if it has lasted at least 6 months when we arbitrarily declare that the patient has two different illnesses. Those described as depression without GAD may have been experiencing anxious symptoms for anything up to 6 months, so the classifications do not really recognise a concept of non-anxious depression. In general medical settings, if the duration of anxiety is The central importance of anxiety in common mental disorders