Abstract:China’s forest market is one of the largest in the world in terms of production, consumption, and imports of wood products. Its large forest estate and massive population has meant that it has also for some time been a leading nation in terms of the number of processing plants, number of people employed in the forestry sector, the scope of its non-timber forest markets, and the overall level of contributions of forest enterprises and markets to local livelihoods. However, despite this importance the exact nature of China’s forest market has long been a mystery to the outside world, as well as to most Chinese. Until recently there has been limited interest, or capacity, to seek a more detailed picture but this has changed in the last few years with China’s booming forest imports and rapidly expanding domestic market. China has suddenly become the wood workshop of the world, capturing almost one-third of the total global trade in furniture. Fully one-half of all timber imports (logs, sawnwood and panels) are now processed and exported as finished products and the marked increase in manufacturing and domestic consumption in a nation with very limited per capita forest resources has fueled the rise in imports. Furthermore, the combination of this booming domestic demand and growing export-oriented processing industry is affecting the industry globally causing some enterprises to collapse, while creating opportunities for others. An outcome of all this activity is that industry and government leaders around the world are reassessing their competitive positions in light of the new Chinese market. While China’s increased forest product demand and exports have affected supplying countries worldwide, impacts are particularly marked in the Asia Pacific Region. Some 70% of all of China’ĺs timber imports come from Asia Pacific countries and China has become the leading market for most of them. In many cases, increasing trade f lows are associated with unsustainable harvesting, corruption, illegal logging, and the abuse of indigenous and other forest community rights. But while China’s surging demand has aggravated and accelerated degradation of natural forests in some situations, it is also leading to the establishment of new plantations both in China in many supplying countries. Indeed, China’s growing demand also creates the possibility that millions of lowincome forest producers within China and in producer countries globally can participate, and perhaps benefit in this new market. Trees and forests are the primary asset of millions of the worldĺs poorest people and when governments act to enable them to use these assets forestry can be an important instrument of rural development. This potential, for the Chinese market to assist in the alleviation of poverty both domestically and in some supplying countries, is encouraging government and development officials to inquire about the range of impacts and implications of the Chinese forest market. But this growing global interest in the Chinese market from industry, governments and development organizations has not yet been met with rigorous and publicly accessible analyses of the macro-level trends and issues. The primary source of market information to date has been proprietary analyses, the cost of which has precluded their use to all but the largest international investors and trade associations. And even these reports have been of mixed quality due to the weakness of the official data and the lack of independent peer review. Governments, researchers, nongovernmental organizations and international development institutions have lacked the information necessary to understand and assess the implications of the Chinese forest market. This Special Issue of the International Forestry Review has been produced in order to begin to address this problem. Since early 2003 Forest Trends, the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and the Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy (CCAP), supported by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID), has worked with partners in China and across the region to begin to Understanding the Chinese forest market and its global implications

Ecologically unequal exchange, repression, and forest loss: How China's demand for agricultural products impacts the natural environment

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China’s Exports

Revealing Environmental Inequality Hidden in China’s Inter-regional Trade

China's Unequal Ecological Exchange

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China's Exports

Exporters' Environmental Premium in a Developing Country: Firm‐level Evidence from China

Effect of Agricultural Employment and Export Diversification Index on Environmental Pollution: Building the Agenda towards Sustainability

Examining inequities in species loss due to land use in China from an interregional trade perspective

Understanding the Chinese Forest Market and Its Global Implications

China’s Forest Land Use Change in the Globalized World Economy: Foreign Trade and Unequal Household Consumption

Trade Reform, Household Effects, and Poverty in Rural China

Agricultural Trade Liberalization and Poverty in China

Does Geopolitical Risk Affect Agricultural Exports? Chinese Evidence from the Perspective of Agricultural Land

Importing food damages domestic environment: Evidence from global soybean trade

An Empirical Analysis of China's State-Owned Forests

Statistical Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulation on China’s Agricultural Products Export

A new meta-coupling framework to diagnose the inequity hidden in China’s cultivated land use

A new meta-coupling framework to diagnose the inequity hidden in China's cultivated land use

Changes in Trade and Domestic Distortions Affecting China’s Agriculture

The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm Exports: Evidence from Environmental Information Disclosure Policy in China

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Strict Environmental Regulations on China' s Horticultural Products Export Competitiveness —— Based on the Environmental Input-output Model