Abstract:China’s forest market is one of the largest in the world in terms of production, consumption, and imports of wood products. Its large forest estate and massive population has meant that it has also for some time been a leading nation in terms of the number of processing plants, number of people employed in the forestry sector, the scope of its non-timber forest markets, and the overall level of contributions of forest enterprises and markets to local livelihoods. However, despite this importance the exact nature of China’s forest market has long been a mystery to the outside world, as well as to most Chinese. Until recently there has been limited interest, or capacity, to seek a more detailed picture but this has changed in the last few years with China’s booming forest imports and rapidly expanding domestic market. China has suddenly become the wood workshop of the world, capturing almost one-third of the total global trade in furniture. Fully one-half of all timber imports (logs, sawnwood and panels) are now processed and exported as finished products and the marked increase in manufacturing and domestic consumption in a nation with very limited per capita forest resources has fueled the rise in imports. Furthermore, the combination of this booming domestic demand and growing export-oriented processing industry is affecting the industry globally causing some enterprises to collapse, while creating opportunities for others. An outcome of all this activity is that industry and government leaders around the world are reassessing their competitive positions in light of the new Chinese market. While China’s increased forest product demand and exports have affected supplying countries worldwide, impacts are particularly marked in the Asia Pacific Region. Some 70% of all of China’ĺs timber imports come from Asia Pacific countries and China has become the leading market for most of them. In many cases, increasing trade f lows are associated with unsustainable harvesting, corruption, illegal logging, and the abuse of indigenous and other forest community rights. But while China’s surging demand has aggravated and accelerated degradation of natural forests in some situations, it is also leading to the establishment of new plantations both in China in many supplying countries. Indeed, China’s growing demand also creates the possibility that millions of lowincome forest producers within China and in producer countries globally can participate, and perhaps benefit in this new market. Trees and forests are the primary asset of millions of the worldĺs poorest people and when governments act to enable them to use these assets forestry can be an important instrument of rural development. This potential, for the Chinese market to assist in the alleviation of poverty both domestically and in some supplying countries, is encouraging government and development officials to inquire about the range of impacts and implications of the Chinese forest market. But this growing global interest in the Chinese market from industry, governments and development organizations has not yet been met with rigorous and publicly accessible analyses of the macro-level trends and issues. The primary source of market information to date has been proprietary analyses, the cost of which has precluded their use to all but the largest international investors and trade associations. And even these reports have been of mixed quality due to the weakness of the official data and the lack of independent peer review. Governments, researchers, nongovernmental organizations and international development institutions have lacked the information necessary to understand and assess the implications of the Chinese forest market. This Special Issue of the International Forestry Review has been produced in order to begin to address this problem. Since early 2003 Forest Trends, the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and the Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy (CCAP), supported by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID), has worked with partners in China and across the region to begin to Understanding the Chinese forest market and its global implications

An Empirical Analysis of China's State-Owned Forests

Empirical Study of Reform and Development in the Key State-owned Forest Area

Recent changes in Chinese forestry seen through the lens of Forest Transition theory

Tree Plantations Displacing Native Forests: the Nature and Drivers of Apparent Forest Recovery on Former Croplands in Southwestern China from 2000 to 2015

Relationship Between Forest Resources and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China

Impacts of Policy Measures on the Development of State-Owned Forests in Northeast China: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence

Reforming China's Land Policy for Its Green Target

Is Regulation Protection? Forest Logging Quota Impact on Forest Carbon Sinks in China

Linkage Analysis of the Resources, Population, and Economy in China’s Key State-Owned Forest Areas

Trend and Influence Factors of State-owned Forest Resources

Spatially Varying Patterns of Afforestation/reforestation and Socio-Economic Factors in China: a Geographically Weighted Regression Approach

Research on development level and spatial distribution characteristics of state-owned forest farms in China

Contrasting Forest Loss and Gain Patterns in Subtropical China Detected Using an Integrated LandTrendr and Machine-Learning Method

The Changes in China's Forests: an Analysis Using the Forest Identity.

Economic Growth, Government Policies, and Forest Transition in China

Understanding the Chinese Forest Market and Its Global Implications

Reconstruction of Human-Induced Forest Loss in China during 1900–2000

Temporal and Spatial Analysis of the Changes in the Supply of Ecological Products in State-Owned Forest Farms after the Reform

The Spatiotemporal Patterns and Pathways of Forest Transition in China

Factors Influencing Four Decades of Forest Change in Guizhou Province, China

Effects of Bio-physical, Economic and Ecological Policy Drivers on China’s Forest Quality transition: Evidence from Panel Analysis