Abstract:Promoting high-quality export development is a crucial strategic decision for economic transformation and upgrading. However, the effects and potential mechanisms of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality remain a subject of debate. This study investigates the impact of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality by analyzing firm-level data from 2000 to 2013. The study employs a quasi-natural experiment that focuses on the Key Air Pollution Control Zone (KRAPC) implemented by the central government in 2010. We found that environmental regulations, as represented by this policy, significantly enhance the firms' export product quality. At the macro perspective, this improvement primarily stems from the reduction of air pollution in the designated areas, and advancements in regional innovation and human capital. At the micro perspective, the main mechanisms are the reallocation of resources and the “Porter effect”. The former mainly involves reducing the production scale or even withdrawing high-energy-consuming and high-polluting enterprises, resulting in improved export product quality among new market entrants. The latter is manifested through enhanced enterprise innovation abilities, increased productivity, and reduced production costs. Furthermore, the impact of the KRAPC policy on firms’ export product quality varies depending on factors such as ownership, size, and technology intensity. In addition, the policy has positive spillover effects on neighboring non-key areas. Therefore, this study supports the government in formulating a scientific environmental policy that promotes a mutually beneficial relationship between economic growth and environmental protection.

Exporters' Environmental Premium in a Developing Country: Firm‐level Evidence from China

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China’s Exports

Does environmental regulation affect the export competitiveness of Chinese firms?

Environmental Regulation and Firm Exports: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Do Export Tax Rebates Promote Firm Upgrading? Evidences from Labor-Intensive Firms in China

Can the green credit policy enhance firm export quality? Evidence from China based on the DID model

The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm Exports: Evidence from Environmental Information Disclosure Policy in China

Export upgrading and environmental performance: Evidence from China

Markets and Markups: A New Empirical Framework and Evidence on Exporters from China

Does environmental regulation increase domestic value-added in exports? An empirical study of cleaner production standards in China

Environmental information disclosure and firm export: evidence from China

On the relationship between pollution reduction and export product quality: Evidence from Chinese firms

The impact of export VAT rebate reduction on firms'pollution emissions: Evidence from Chinese enterprises

Environmental Regulation and Firm Exports: Evidence from the Eleventh Five-Year Plan in China

How Does Environmental Regulation Affect Firm's Share of Domestic Value-Added in Gross Exports in China?

Pollution Emission Intensity and Domestic Value-Added Rate of Firms' Exports: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Microdata

How exports affect green technology innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Chinese companies listed on the growth enterprise market

Environmental regulations in developing countries and the span of firms' production stages: Evidence from China

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China's Exports

Emissions Reduction Target Plan and Export Product Quality: Evidence from China's 11th Five-Year Plan

Does environmental regulation improve firms' export product quality? Empirical evidence based on China's key regional air pollution and control policy