Abstract:Findings of reciprocity in domestic dogs have been inconsistent. We investigated whether pet dogs would provide food to a helpful conspecific who had pressed a button to donate food to them and an unhelpful partner who had not provided food. We found that dogs did not reciprocate the receipt of food and also that the familiarity of the partner had no influence on reciprocity. Moreover, salivary oxytocin concentration was not influenced by receiving help or not. Reciprocity is one of the most prominent explanations for the evolution of stable cooperation. Although reciprocity has been studied for decades in numerous animal species and behavioural contexts, its underlying proximate mechanisms remain unclear. Domestic dogs provide a useful model species for the study of proximate mechanisms, though there are currently inconsistent findings regarding dogs' propensity to reciprocate. Here, we investigated whether, after minimal training, pet dogs would press a button, which remotely controlled a food dispenser, to deliver food to an enclosure occupied by a helpful conspecific that had provided them with food or an unhelpful conspecific that had not provided them with food. We included an asocial control condition in which the enclosure was unoccupied and a social facilitation control in which the food delivery mechanism was non‐functional. Whether subjects were familiar with the helpful and unhelpful conspecifics was also varied. In addition, to investigate potential mechanisms underlying reciprocity, we measured subjects salivary oxytocin concentration before and after they experienced the helpful and unhelpful acts. There was no effect of the previous helpfulness or the familiarity of the partner on the number of times subjects pressed the button. However, there was also no effect of the presence of a partner or the operationality of the food delivery mechanism on the number of button presses, indicating that subjects were not pressing the button to provision the partner. Moreover, the experience of the helpful or unhelpful act did not influence subjects' salivary oxytocin concentration. Variation in findings of reciprocity across studies appears to correspond with differing training protocols. Subjects' understanding of the task in the current study may have been constrained by the limited training received. Additional tests to verify subjects' understanding of such tasks are warranted in future studies.

Do pet dogs reciprocate the receipt of food from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics?

Task Differences and Prosociality; Investigating Pet Dogs’ Prosocial Preferences in a Token Choice Paradigm

Working dogs transfer different tasks in reciprocal cooperation

Social Stimulation by the Owner Increases Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) Social Susceptibility in a Food Choice Task—The Possible Effect of Endogenous Oxytocin Release

Domestic pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) do not show a preference to contrafreeload, but are willing

Love Me, Love My Dog: an Experimental Study of Social Connections and Generalized Indirect Reciprocity1

Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats

How context influences primates' decisions about reciprocity

Still face in pet dogs (Canis familiaris).

Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?

Dogs understand the role of a human partner in a cooperative task

Free-ranging dogs quickly learn to recognize a rewarding person

Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog–Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs

The smell of cooperation: rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task

The influence of voice familiarity and linguistic content on dogs' ability to follow human voice direction

You talkin' to me? Functional breed selection may have fundamentally influenced dogs' sensitivity to human verbal communicative cues

Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans

Love Me, Love My Dog: an Experimental Study on Social Connections and Indirect Reciprocity

When deciding to cooperate by direct reciprocity, Norway rats sometimes benefit from olfactory competence and seem not impaired by insufficient cognitive abilities

Dogs with prior experience of a task still overimitate their caregiver

How do soundboard-trained dogs respond to human button presses? An investigation into word comprehension