Abstract:Findings of reciprocity in domestic dogs have been inconsistent. We investigated whether pet dogs would provide food to a helpful conspecific who had pressed a button to donate food to them and an unhelpful partner who had not provided food. We found that dogs did not reciprocate the receipt of food and also that the familiarity of the partner had no influence on reciprocity. Moreover, salivary oxytocin concentration was not influenced by receiving help or not. Reciprocity is one of the most prominent explanations for the evolution of stable cooperation. Although reciprocity has been studied for decades in numerous animal species and behavioural contexts, its underlying proximate mechanisms remain unclear. Domestic dogs provide a useful model species for the study of proximate mechanisms, though there are currently inconsistent findings regarding dogs' propensity to reciprocate. Here, we investigated whether, after minimal training, pet dogs would press a button, which remotely controlled a food dispenser, to deliver food to an enclosure occupied by a helpful conspecific that had provided them with food or an unhelpful conspecific that had not provided them with food. We included an asocial control condition in which the enclosure was unoccupied and a social facilitation control in which the food delivery mechanism was non‐functional. Whether subjects were familiar with the helpful and unhelpful conspecifics was also varied. In addition, to investigate potential mechanisms underlying reciprocity, we measured subjects salivary oxytocin concentration before and after they experienced the helpful and unhelpful acts. There was no effect of the previous helpfulness or the familiarity of the partner on the number of times subjects pressed the button. However, there was also no effect of the presence of a partner or the operationality of the food delivery mechanism on the number of button presses, indicating that subjects were not pressing the button to provision the partner. Moreover, the experience of the helpful or unhelpful act did not influence subjects' salivary oxytocin concentration. Variation in findings of reciprocity across studies appears to correspond with differing training protocols. Subjects' understanding of the task in the current study may have been constrained by the limited training received. Additional tests to verify subjects' understanding of such tasks are warranted in future studies.

How do soundboard-trained dogs respond to human button presses? An investigation into word comprehension

Soundboard-trained dogs produce non-accidental, non-random and non-imitative two-button combinations

The influence of voice familiarity and linguistic content on dogs' ability to follow human voice direction

Perception of vocoded speech in domestic dogs

Animal cognition: Dogs build semantic expectations between spoken words and objects

You talkin' to me? Functional breed selection may have fundamentally influenced dogs' sensitivity to human verbal communicative cues

Personality and Cognitive Profiles of Animal-Assisted Intervention Dogs and Pet Dogs in an Unsolvable Task

Supporting Young Readers: A Mixed-Methods Study of Their Literacy, Behaviour, and Perceptions When Reading Aloud to Dogs or Adults

Does My Dog ''Speak'' Like Me? The Acoustic Correlation between Pet Dogs and Their Human Owners

In "Tone" with dogs: exploring canine musicality

Increased resistance to sudden noise by audio stimulation during early ontogeny in German shepherd puppies

Bred for affection: The canine anterior ectosylvian gyrus responds selectively to social reinforcement

Do pet dogs reciprocate the receipt of food from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics?

Intra and interspecific audience effect on domestic dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions

Representation of rewards differing in their hedonic valence in the caudate nucleus correlates with the performance in a problem-solving task in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Digitally-Enhanced Dog Behavioral Testing: Getting Help from the Machine

Exploring breed differences in discrimination, reversal learning, and resistance to extinction in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris)

Dog–human vocal interactions match dogs' sensory-motor tuning

Dogs in Schools: The Impact of Specific Human–Dog Interactions on Reading Ability in Children Aged 6 to 8 Years

Discrimination of cat-directed speech from human-directed speech in a population of indoor companion cats (Felis catus)

The mouth matters most: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of how dogs perceive inanimate objects