Abstract:Findings of reciprocity in domestic dogs have been inconsistent. We investigated whether pet dogs would provide food to a helpful conspecific who had pressed a button to donate food to them and an unhelpful partner who had not provided food. We found that dogs did not reciprocate the receipt of food and also that the familiarity of the partner had no influence on reciprocity. Moreover, salivary oxytocin concentration was not influenced by receiving help or not. Reciprocity is one of the most prominent explanations for the evolution of stable cooperation. Although reciprocity has been studied for decades in numerous animal species and behavioural contexts, its underlying proximate mechanisms remain unclear. Domestic dogs provide a useful model species for the study of proximate mechanisms, though there are currently inconsistent findings regarding dogs' propensity to reciprocate. Here, we investigated whether, after minimal training, pet dogs would press a button, which remotely controlled a food dispenser, to deliver food to an enclosure occupied by a helpful conspecific that had provided them with food or an unhelpful conspecific that had not provided them with food. We included an asocial control condition in which the enclosure was unoccupied and a social facilitation control in which the food delivery mechanism was non‐functional. Whether subjects were familiar with the helpful and unhelpful conspecifics was also varied. In addition, to investigate potential mechanisms underlying reciprocity, we measured subjects salivary oxytocin concentration before and after they experienced the helpful and unhelpful acts. There was no effect of the previous helpfulness or the familiarity of the partner on the number of times subjects pressed the button. However, there was also no effect of the presence of a partner or the operationality of the food delivery mechanism on the number of button presses, indicating that subjects were not pressing the button to provision the partner. Moreover, the experience of the helpful or unhelpful act did not influence subjects' salivary oxytocin concentration. Variation in findings of reciprocity across studies appears to correspond with differing training protocols. Subjects' understanding of the task in the current study may have been constrained by the limited training received. Additional tests to verify subjects' understanding of such tasks are warranted in future studies.

Watched or not: Overimitation in dogs under different attentional states

Dogs with prior experience of a task still overimitate their caregiver

Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?

Do dogs preferentially encode the identity of the target object or the location of others' actions?

Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs' Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices

The influence of voice familiarity and linguistic content on dogs' ability to follow human voice direction

You talkin' to me? Functional breed selection may have fundamentally influenced dogs' sensitivity to human verbal communicative cues

Metacognition in dogs: Do dogs know they could be wrong?

Do pet dogs reciprocate the receipt of food from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics?

The social nature of overimitation: Insights from Autism and Williams syndrome

Preschoolers' Motivation to Over-Imitate Humans and Robots

Being observed increases overimitation in three diverse cultures.

Exploring breed differences in discrimination, reversal learning, and resistance to extinction in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris)

Social Stimulation by the Owner Increases Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) Social Susceptibility in a Food Choice Task—The Possible Effect of Endogenous Oxytocin Release

Dogs do not use their own experience with novel barriers to infer others' visual access

Dogs' social susceptibility is differentially affected by various dog–Human interactions. A study on family dogs, former shelter dogs and therapy dogs

Task Differences and Prosociality; Investigating Pet Dogs’ Prosocial Preferences in a Token Choice Paradigm

Going back to "basics": Harlow's learning set task with wolves and dogs

Dogs distinguish authentic human emotions without being empathic

Behavioural synchronisation between different groups of dogs and wolves and their owners/handlers: Exploring the effect of breed and human interaction

Social context effects in 2- and 4-year-olds' selective versus faithful imitation